Method for enhancing production of isoprenoid compounds

ABSTRACT

The present invention provides methods of producing an isoprenoid or an isoprenoid precursor in a genetically modified host cell. The methods generally involve modulating the level of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) in the cell, such that the level of HMG-CoA is not toxic to the cell and/or does not substantially inhibit cell growth, but is maintained at a level that provides for high-level production of mevalonate, IPP, and other downstream products of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid pathway, e.g., polyprenyl diphosphates and isoprenoid compounds. The present invention further provides genetically modified host cells that are suitable for use in a subject method. The present invention further provides recombinant nucleic acid constructs for use in generating a subject genetically modified host cell, including recombinant nucleic acid constructs comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, and recombinant vectors (e.g., recombinant expression vectors) comprising same. The present invention further provides methods for identifying nucleic acids that encode HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) variants that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity. The present invention farther provides methods for identifying agents that reduce intracellular accumulation of HMG-CoA.

CROSS-REFERENCE

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/573,492, filed May 21, 2004, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH

The U.S. government may have certain rights in this invention, pursuant to grant no. BES-9911463 awarded by the National Science Foundation and grant no. FDN00014-99-0182 awarded by the Office of Naval Research.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is in the field of production of isoprenoid compounds, and in particular host cells that are genetically modified to produce isoprenoid compounds.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Isoprenoids constitute an extremely large and diverse group of natural products that have a common biosynthetic origin, i.e., a single metabolic precursor, isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP). At least 20,000 isoprenoids have been described. By definition, isoprenoids are made up of so-called isoprene (C5) units. The number of C-atoms present in the isoprenoids is typically divisible by five (C5, C10, C15, C20, C25, C30 and C40), although irregular isoprenoids and polyterpenes have been reported. Isoprenoid compounds are also referred to as “terpenes” or “terpenoids.” Important members of the isoprenoids include the carotenoids, sesquiterpenoids, diterpenoids, and hemiterpenes. Carotenoids include, e.g., lycopene, β-carotene, and the like, many of which function as antioxidants. Sesquiterpenoids include, e.g., artemisinin, a compound having anti-malarial activity. Diterpenoids include, e.g., taxol, a cancer chemotherapeutic agent.

Isoprenoids comprise the most numerous and structurally diverse family of natural products. In this family, terpenoids isolated from plants and other natural sources are used as commercial flavor and fragrance compounds as well as antimalarial and anticancer drugs. A majority of the terpenoid compounds in use today are natural products or their derivatives. The source organisms (e.g., trees, marine invertebrates) of many of these natural products are neither amenable to the large-scale cultivation necessary to produce commercially viable quantities nor to genetic manipulation for increased production or derivatization of these compounds. Therefore, the natural products must be produced semi-synthetically from analogs or synthetically using conventional chemical syntheses. Furthermore, many natural products have complex structures, and, as a result, are currently uneconomical or impossible to synthesize. Such natural products must be either extracted from their native sources, such as trees, sponges, corals and marine microbes; or produced synthetically or semi-synthetically from more abundant precursors. Extraction of a natural-product from a native source is limited by the availability of the native source; and synthetic or semi-synthetic production of natural products can suffer from low yield and/or high cost. Such production problems and limited availability of the natural source can restrict the commercial and clinical development of such products.

The biosynthesis of isoprenoid natural products in engineered microbes could tap the unrealized commercial and therapeutic potential of these natural resources and yield less expensive and more widely available fine chemicals and pharmaceuticals. A major obstacle to high level terpenoid biosynthesis is the production of terpene precursors. Previous studies have shown that, when expressed in E. coli, the mevalonate pathway provides for production of isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), which can be isomerized and polymerized into isoprenoids and terpenes of commercial value. Optimal redirection of microbial metabolism toward isoprenoid production requires that introduced biosynthetic pathway be properly engineered to both efficiently funnel carbon to IPP and not allow build up of intermediates, which can be toxic. In fact, it has been shown that the expression of mevalonate-producing enzymes can inhibit cell growth and limit the productivity of microbial cultures. It was suggested that the previously reported growth inhibition upon the expression of the mevalonate pathway in the absence of an IPP isomerase, FPP synthase, and terpene synthase led to the accumulation of toxic levels of IPP.

There is a need in the art for improved isoprenoid-producing or isoprenoid precursor-producing host cells that provide for both robust host cell growth and high-level production of isoprenoid compounds, as well as the polyprenyl diphosphate precursors of such compounds. The present invention addresses this need and provides related advantages.

Literature

U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/005678; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2003/0148479; Martin et al. (2003) Nat. Biotech. 21(7):796-802; Polakowski et al. (1998) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49: 67-71; Wilding et al. (2000) J Bacteriol 182(15): 4319-27; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0194162; Donald et al. (1997) Appl. Env. Microbiol. 63:3341-3344; Jackson et al. (2003) Organ. Lett, 5:1629-1632; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0072323; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0029239; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0110259; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0063182; U.S. Pat. No. 5,460,949; U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/0077039; U.S. Pat. No. 6,531,303; U.S. Pat. No. 6,689,593; Hamano et al. (2001) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65:1627-1635; T. Kuzuyama. (2004) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68(4): 931-934; T. Kazuhiko. (2004) Biotechnology Letters. 26: 1487-1491; Brock et al. (2004) Eur J. Biochem. 271: 3227-3241; Choi, et al. (1999) Appl. Environ. Microbio. 65 4363-4368; Parke et al., (2004) Appl. Environ. Microbio. 70: 2974-2983; Subrahmanyam et al. (1998) J. Bact. 180: 4596-4602; Murli et al. (2003) J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 30: 500-509.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods of producing an isoprenoid or an isoprenoid precursor in a genetically modified host cell. The methods generally involve modulating the level of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) in the cell, such that the level of HMG-CoA is not toxic to the cell and/or does not substantially inhibit cell growth, but is maintained at a level that provides for high-level production of mevalonate, IPP, and other downstream products of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid pathway, e.g., polyprenyl diphosphates and isoprenoid compounds. The present invention further provides genetically modified host cells that are suitable for use in a subject method. The present invention further provides recombinant nucleic acid constructs for use in generating a subject genetically modified host cell, including recombinant nucleic acid constructs comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, and recombinant vectors (e.g., recombinant expression vectors) comprising same. The present invention further provides methods for identifying nucleic acids that encode HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR) variants that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity. The present invention further provides methods for identifying agents that reduce intracellular accumulation of HMG-CoA.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of isoprenoid metabolic pathways that result in the production of the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway intermediates polyprenyl diphosphates geranyl diphosphate (GPP), farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPPP), from isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP).

FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the mevalonate (MEV) pathway for the production of IPP.

FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of the DXP pathway for the production of IPP and dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP).

FIG. 4 depicts amorphadiene production in an E. coli strain genetically modified to produce IPP via the mevalonate pathway, cultured in medium supplemented with no mevalonate, 10 mM mevalonate, or 20 mM mevalonate.

FIG. 5 depicts the inhibitory effect of increased expression of the MevT operon on cell growth of E. coli genetically modified with the MevT operon.

FIG. 6 depicts the effect of increased expression of each of the individual genes contained in the MevT operon and combinations thereof on cell growth.

FIG. 7 depicts the effect of catalytically inactive HMGS on cell growth of E. coli.

FIG. 8 depicts intracellular accumulation of HMG-CoA in E. coli strains expressing toxic mevalonate pathway constructs.

FIG. 9 depicts the effect of HMG-CoA accumulation on cell growth.

FIG. 10 depicts the effect of increased expression of tHMGR on cell growth.

FIG. 11 depicts the effect of increased expression of tHMGR on HMG-CoA accumulation.

FIG. 12 depicts the effect of increased expression of tHMGR on mevalonate production.

FIGS. 13A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pBAD24MevT plasmid (SEQ ID NO:1).

FIGS. 14A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pBAD33MevT plasmid (SEQ ID NO:2).

FIGS. 15A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pMevT plasmid (SEQ ID NO:3).

FIGS. 16A-D depict the nucleotide sequence of the pMBIS plasmid (SEQ ID NO:4).

FIGS. 17A-B depict the nucleotide sequence of the pADS plasmid (SEQ ID NO:5).

FIGS. 18A-B depict the nucleotide sequence of the pAtoB plasmid (SEQ ID NO:6).

FIGS. 19A-B depict the nucleotide sequence of the pHMGS plasmid (SEQ ID NO:7).

FIGS. 20A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pHMGR plasmid (SEQ ID NO:8).

FIGS. 21A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pBAD18HMGR plasmid (SEQ ID NO:9).

FIGS. 22A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pHMGSR plasmid (SEQ ID NO:10).

FIGS. 23A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pBAD33MevT(C159A) plasmid (SEQ ID NO: 11).

FIGS. 24A-C depict the nucleotide sequence of the pHMGS(C159A) plasmid (SEQ ID NO:12).

DEFINITIONS

The terms “isoprenoid,” “isoprenoid compound.” “terpene,” “terpene compound,” “terpenoid,” and “terpenoid compound” are used interchangeably herein. Isoprenoid compounds are made up various numbers of so-called isoprene (C5) units. The number of C-atoms present in the isoprenoids is typically evenly divisible by five (e.g. C5, C10, C15, C20, C25, C30 and C40). Irregular isoprenoids and polyterpenes have been reported, and are also included in the definition of “isoprenoid.” Isoprenoid compounds include, but are not limited to, monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, triterpenes, polyterpenes, and diterpenes.

As used herein, the term “prenyl diphosphate” is used interchangeably with “prenyl pyrophosphate,” and includes monoprenyl diphosphates having a single prenyl group (e.g., IPP and DMAPP), as well as polyprenyl diphosphates that include 2 or more prenyl groups. Monoprenyl diphosphates include isopentenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) and its isomer dimethylallyl pyrophosphate (DMAPP).

As used herein, the term “terpene synthase” refers to any enzyme that enzymatically modifies IPP, DMAPP, or a polyprenyl pyrophosphate, such that a terpenoid compound is produced. The term “terpene synthase” includes enzymes that catalyze the conversion of a prenyl diphosphate into an isoprenoid.

The word “pyrophosphate” is used interchangeably herein with “diphosphate.” Thus, e.g., the terms “prenyl diphosphate” and “prenyl pyrophosphate” are interchangeable; the terms “isopentenyl pyrophosphate” and “isopentenyl diphosphate” are interchangeable; the terms farnesyl diphosphate” and farnesyl pyrophosphate” are interchangeable; etc.

The term “mevalonate pathway” or “MEV pathway” is used herein to refer to the biosynthetic pathway that converts acetyl-CoA to IPP. The mevalonate pathway comprises enzymes that catalyze the following steps: (a) condensing two molecules of acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA; (b) condensing acetoacetyl-CoA with acetyl-CoA to form HMG-CoA; (c) converting HMG-CoA to mevalonate; (d) phosphorylating mevalonate to mevalonate 5-phosphate; (e) converting mevalonate 5-phosphate to mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate; and (f) converting mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate to isopentenyl pyrophosphate. The mevalonate pathway is illustrated schematically in FIG. 2. The “top half” of the mevalonate pathway refers to the enzymes responsible for the conversion of acetyl-CoA to mevalonate through a TV pathway intermediate.

The term “1-deoxy-D-xylulose 5-diphosphate pathway” or “DXP pathway” is used herein to refer to the pathway that converts glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate and pyruvate to IPP and DMAPP through a DXP pathway intermediate, where DXP pathway comprises enzymes that catalyze the reactions depicted schematically in FIG. 3.

As used herein, the term “prenyl transferase” is used interchangeably with the terms “isoprenyl diphosphate synthase” and “polyprenyl synthase” (e.g., “GPP synthase,” “FPP synthase,” “OPP synthase,” etc.) to refer to an enzyme that catalyzes the consecutive 1′-4 condensation of isopentenyl diphosphate with allylic primer substrates, resulting in the formation of prenyl diphosphates of various chain lengths.

The terms “polynucleotide” and “nucleic acid,” used interchangeably herein, refer to a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, either ribonucleotides or deoxynucleotides. Thus, this term includes, but is not limited to, single-, double-, or multi-stranded DNA or RNA, genomic DNA, cDNA, DNA-RNA hybrids, or a polymer comprising purine and pyrimidine bases or other natural, chemically or biochemically modified, non-natural, or derivatized nucleotide bases.

As used herein, the terms “operon” and “single transcription unit” are used interchangeably to refer to two or more contiguous coding regions (nucleotide sequences that encode a gene product such as an RNA or a protein) that are coordinately regulated by one or more controlling elements (e.g., a promoter). As used herein, the term “gene product” refers to RNA encoded by DNA (or vice versa) or protein that is encoded by an RNA or DNA, where a gene will typically comprise one or more nucleotide sequences that encode a protein, and may also include introns and other non-coding nucleotide sequences.

The terms “peptide,” “polypeptide,” and “protein” are used interchangeably herein, and refer to a polymeric form of amino acids of any length, which can include coded and non-coded amino acids, chemically or biochemically modified or derivatized amino acids, and polypeptides having modified peptide backbones.

The term “naturally-occurring” as used herein as applied to a nucleic acid, a cell, or an organism, refers to a nucleic acid, cell, or organism that is found in nature. For example, a polypeptide or polynucleotide sequence that is present in an organism (including viruses) that can be isolated from a source in nature and which has not been intentionally modified by a human in the laboratory is naturally occurring.

The term “heterologous nucleic acid,” as used herein, refers to a nucleic acid wherein at least one of the following is true: (a) the nucleic acid is foreign (“exogenous”) to (i.e., not naturally found in) a given host microorganism or host cell; (b) the nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence that is naturally found in (e.g., is “endogenous to”) a given host microorganism or host cell (e.g., the nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence endogenous to the host microorganism or host cell); however, in the context of a heterologous nucleic acid, the same nucleotide sequence as found endogenously is produced in an unnatural (e.g., greater than expected or greater than naturally found) amount in the cell, or a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence that differs in sequence from the endogenous nucleotide sequence but encodes the same protein (having the same or substantially the same amino acid sequence) as found endogenously is produced in an unnatural (e.g., greater than expected or greater than naturally found) amount in the cell; (c) the nucleic acid comprises two or more nucleotide sequences that are not found in the same relationship to each other in nature, e.g., the nucleic acid is recombinant. An example of a heterologous nucleic acid is a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR operably linked to a transcriptional control element (e.g., a promoter) to which an endogenous (naturally-occurring) HMGR coding sequence is not normally operably linked. Another example of a heterologous nucleic acid a high copy number plasmid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR. Another example of a heterologous nucleic acid is a nucleic acid encoding HMGR, where a host cell that does not normally produce HMGR is genetically modified with the nucleic acid encoding HMGR; because HMGR-encoding nucleic acids are not naturally found in the host cell, the nucleic acid is heterologous to the genetically modified host cell.

“Recombinant,” as used herein, means that a particular nucleic acid (DNA or RNA) is the product of various combinations of cloning, restriction, and/or ligation steps resulting in a construct having a structural coding or non-coding sequence distinguishable from endogenous nucleic acids found in natural systems. Generally, DNA sequences encoding the structural coding sequence can be assembled from cDNA fragments and short oligonucleotide linkers, or from a series of synthetic oligonucleotides, to provide a synthetic nucleic acid which is capable of being expressed from a recombinant transcriptional unit contained in a cell or in a cell-free transcription and translation system. Such sequences can be provided in the form of an open reading frame uninterrupted by internal non-translated sequences, or introns, which are typically present in eukaryotic genes. Genomic DNA comprising the relevant sequences can also be used in the formation of a recombinant gene or transcriptional unit. Sequences of non-translated DNA may be present 5′ or 3′ from the open reading frame, where such sequences do not interfere with manipulation or expression of the coding regions, and may indeed act to modulate production of a desired product by various mechanisms (see “DNA regulatory sequences”, below).

Thus, e.g., the term “recombinant” polynucleotide or nucleic acid refers to one which is not naturally occurring, e.g., is made by the artificial combination of two otherwise separated segments of sequence through human intervention. This artificial combination is often accomplished by either chemical synthesis means, or by the artificial manipulation of isolated segments of nucleic acids, e.g., by genetic engineering techniques. Such is usually done to replace a codon with a redundant codon encoding the same or a conservative amino acid, while typically introducing or removing a sequence recognition site. Alternatively, it is performed to join together nucleic acid segments of desired functions to generate a desired combination of functions. This artificial combination is often accomplished by either chemical synthesis means, or by the artificial manipulation of isolated segments of nucleic acids, e.g., by genetic engineering techniques.

By “construct” is meant a recombinant nucleic acid, generally recombinant DNA, which has been generated for the purpose of the expression of a specific nucleotide sequencers), or is to be used in the construction of other recombinant nucleotide sequences.

As used herein, the term “exogenous nucleic acid” refers to a nucleic acid that is not normally or naturally found in and/or produced by a given bacterium, organism, or cell in nature. As used herein, the term “endogenous nucleic acid” refers to a nucleic acid that is normally found in and/or produced by a given bacterium, organism, or cell in nature. An “endogenous nucleic acid” is also referred to as a “native nucleic acid” or a nucleic acid that is “native” to a given bacterium, organism, or cell. For example, the nucleic acids encoding HMGS, mevalonate kinase, and phosphomevalonate kinase in Example 1 represent exogenous nucleic acids to E. coli. These mevalonate pathway nucleic acids were cloned from Sacchromyces cerevisiae. In S. cerevisiae, the gene sequences encoding HMGS, MK, and PMK on the chromosome would be “endogenous” nucleic acids.

The terms “DNA regulatory sequences,” “control elements,” and “regulatory elements,” used interchangeably herein, refer to transcriptional and translational control sequences, such as promoters, enhancers, polyadenylation signals, terminators, protein degradation signals, and the like, that provide for and/or regulate expression of a coding sequence and/or production of an encoded polypeptide in a host cell.

The term “transformation” is used interchangeably herein with “genetic modification” and refers to a permanent or transient genetic change induced in a cell following introduction of new nucleic acid (i.e., DNA exogenous to the cell). Genetic change (“modification”) can be accomplished either by incorporation of the new DNA into the genome of the host cell, or by transient or stable maintenance of the new DNA as an episomal element. Where the cell is a eukaryotic cell, a permanent genetic change is generally achieved by introduction of the DNA into the genome of the cell. In prokaryotic cells, permanent changes can be introduced into the chromosome or via extrachromosomal elements such as plasmids and expression vectors, which may contain one or more selectable markers to aid in their maintenance in the recombinant host cell.

“Operably linked” refers to a juxtaposition wherein the components so described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner. For instance, a promoter is operably linked to a coding sequence if the promoter affects its transcription or expression. As used herein, the terms “heterologous promoter” and “heterologous control regions” refer to promoters and other control regions that are not normally associated with a particular nucleic acid in nature. For example, a “transcriptional control region heterologous to a coding region” is a transcriptional control region that is not normally associated with the coding region in nature.

A “host cell,” as used herein, denotes an in vivo or in vitro eukaryotic cell, a prokaryotic cell, or a cell from a multicellular organism (e.g., a cell line) cultured as a unicellular entity, which eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells can be, or have been, used as recipients for a nucleic acid (e.g., an expression vector that comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding one or more biosynthetic pathway gene products such as mevalonate pathway gene products), and include the progeny of the original cell which has been genetically modified by the nucleic acid. It is understood that the progeny of a single cell may not necessarily be completely identical in morphology or in genomic or total DNA complement as the original parent, due to natural, accidental, or deliberate mutation. A “recombinant host cell” (also referred to as a “genetically modified host cell”) is a host cell into which has been introduced a heterologous nucleic acid, e.g., an expression vector. For example, a subject prokaryotic host cell is a genetically modified prokaryotic host cell (e.g., a bacterium), by virtue of introduction into a suitable prokaryotic host cell a heterologous nucleic acid, e.g., an exogenous nucleic acid that is foreign to (not normally found in nature in) the prokaryotic host cell, or a recombinant nucleic acid that is not normally found in the prokaryotic host cell; and a subject eukaryotic host cell is a genetically modified eukaryotic host cell, by virtue of introduction into a suitable eukaryotic host cell a heterologous nucleic acid, e.g., an exogenous nucleic acid that is foreign to the eukaryotic host cell, or a recombinant nucleic acid that is not normally found in the eukaryotic host cell.

As used herein the term “Isolated” is meant to describe a polynucleotide, a polypeptide, or a cell that is in an environment different from that in which the polynucleotide, the polypeptide, or the cell naturally occurs. An isolated genetically modified host cell may be present in a mixed population of genetically modified host cells.

Expression cassettes may be prepared comprising a transcription initiation or transcriptional control region(s) (e.g., a promoter), the coding region for the protein of interest, and a transcriptional termination region. Transcriptional control regions include those that provide for over-expression of the protein of interest in the genetically modified host cell; those that provide for inducible expression, such that when an inducing agent is added to the culture medium, transcription of the coding region of the protein of interest is induced or increased to a higher level than prior to induction.

A nucleic acid is “hybridizable” to another nucleic acid, such as a cDNA, genomic DNA, or RNA, when a single stranded form of the nucleic acid can anneal to the other nucleic acid under the appropriate conditions of temperature and solution ionic strength. Hybridization and washing conditions are well known and exemplified in Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Second Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (1989), particularly Chapter 11 and Table 11.1 therein; and Sambrook, J. and Russell, W., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor (2001). The conditions of temperature and ionic strength determine the “stringency” of the hybridization. Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments, such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, to highly similar fragments, such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. Hybridization conditions and post-hybridization washes are useful to obtain the desired determine stringency conditions of the hybridization. One set of illustrative post-hybridization washes is a series of washes starting with 6×SSC (where SSC is 0.15 M NaCl and 15 mM citrate buffer), 0.5% SDS at room temperature for 15 minutes, then repeated with 2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 45° C. for 30 minutes, and then repeated twice with 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS at 50° C. for 30 minutes. Other stringent conditions are obtained by using higher temperatures in which the washes are identical to those above except for the temperature of the final two 30 minute washes in 0.2×SSC, 0.5% SDS, which is increased to 60° C. Another set of highly stringent conditions uses two final washes in 0.1×SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. Another example of stringent hybridization conditions is hybridization at 50° C. or higher and 0.1×SSC (15 mM sodium chloride/1.5 mM sodium citrate). Another example of stringent hybridization conditions is overnight incubation at 42° C. in a solution: 50% formamide, 5×SSC (150 mM NaCl, 15 mM trisodium citrate), 50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.6), 5×Denhardt's solution, 10% dextran sulfate, and 20 μg/ml denatured, sheared salmon sperm DNA, followed by washing the filters in 0a 1×SSC at about 65° C. Stringent hybridization conditions and post-hybridization wash conditions are hybridization conditions and post-hybridization wash conditions that are at least as stringent as the above representative conditions.

Hybridization requires that the two nucleic acids contain complementary sequences, although depending on the stringency of the hybridization, mismatches between bases are possible. The appropriate stringency for hybridizing nucleic acids depends on the length of the nucleic acids and the degree of complementation, variables well known in the art. The greater the degree of similarity or homology between two nucleotide sequences, the greater the value of the melting temperature (Tm) for hybrids of nucleic acids having those sequences. The relative stability (corresponding to higher Tm) of nucleic acid hybridizations decreases in the following order: RNA:RNA, DNA:RNA, DNA:DNA. For hybrids of greater than 100 nucleotides in length, equations for calculating Tm have been derived (see Sambrook et al., supra, 9.50-9.51). For hybridizations with shorter nucleic acids, i.e., oligonucleotides, the position of mismatches becomes more important, and the length of the oligonucleotide determines its specificity (see Sambrook et al., supra, 11.7-11.8). Typically, the length for a hybridizable nucleic acid is at least about 10 nucleotides. Illustrative minimum lengths for a hybridizable nucleic acid are: at least about 15 nucleotides; at least about 20 nucleotides; and at least about 30 nucleotides. Furthermore, the skilled artisan will recognize that the temperature and wash solution salt concentration may be adjusted as necessary according to factors such as length of the probe.

The term “conservative amino acid substitution” refers to the interchangeability in proteins of amino acid residues having similar side chains. For example, a group of amino acids having aliphatic side chains consists of glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, and isoleucine; a group of amino acids having aliphatic-hydroxyl side chains consists of serine and threonine; a group of amino acids having amide-containing side chains consists of asparagine and glutamine; a group of amino acids having aromatic side chains consists of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; a group of amino acids having basic side chains consists of lysine, arginine, and histidine; and a group of amino acids having sulfur-containing side chains consists of cysteine and methionine. Exemplary conservative amino acids substitution groups are: valine-leucine-isoleucine, phenylalanine-tyrosine, lysine-arginine, alanine-valine, and asparagine-glutamine.

“Synthetic nucleic acids” can be assembled from oligonucleotide building blocks that are chemically synthesized using procedures known to those skilled in the art. These building blocks are ligated and annealed to form gene segments which are then enzymatically assembled to construct the entire gene. “Chemically synthesized,” as related to a sequence of DNA, means that the component nucleotides were assembled in vitro. Manual chemical synthesis of DNA may be accomplished using well-established procedures, or automated chemical synthesis can be performed using one of a number of commercially available machines. The nucleotide sequence of the nucleic acids can be modified for optimal expression based on optimization of nucleotide sequence to reflect the codon bias of the host cell. The skilled artisan appreciates the likelihood of successful expression if codon usage is biased towards those codons favored by the host. Determination of preferred codons can be based on a survey of genes derived from the host cell where sequence information is available.

A polynucleotide or polypeptide has a certain percent “sequence identity” to another polynucleotide or polypeptide, meaning that, when aligned, that percentage of bases or amino acids are the same, and in the same relative position, when comparing the two sequences. Sequence similarity can be determined in a number of different manners. To determine sequence identity, sequences can be aligned using the methods and computer programs, including BLAST, available over the world wide web at ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST. See, e.g., Altschul et al. (1990), J. Mol. Biol. 215; 403-10. Another alignment algorithm is FASTA, available in the Genetics Computing Group (GCG) package, from Madison, Wis., USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Oxford Molecular Group, Inc. Other techniques for alignment are described in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 266: Computer Methods for Macromolecular Sequence Analysis (1996), ed. Doolittle, Academic Press, Inc., a division of Harcourt Brace & Co., San Diego, Calif., USA. Of particular interest are alignment programs that permit gaps in the sequence. The Smith-Waterman is one type of algorithm that permits gaps in sequence alignments. See Meth. Mol. Biol. 70: 173-187 (1997). Also, the GAP program using the Needleman and Wunsch alignment method can be utilized to align sequences. See J. Mol. Bio. 48: 443-453 (1970).

Before the present invention is further described, it is to be understood that this invention is not limited to particular embodiments described, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, since the scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appended claims.

Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range, is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in the smaller ranges, and are also encompassed within the invention, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either or both of those included limits are also included in the invention.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All publications mentioned herein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited.

It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a genetically modified host cell” includes a plurality of such host cells and reference to “the HMG-CoA reductase” includes reference to one or more HMG-CoA reductases and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation.

The publications discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention is not entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention. Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from the actual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides methods of reducing the inhibitory accumulation of HMG-CoA in genetically modified host cells useful in the production of isoprenoids or isoprenoid precursor and methods for increasing production of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor in these host cells through the elimination of this toxicity. The methods generally involve modulating the level of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) in the host cell, such that the level of HMG-CoA is not toxic to the host cell, and/or does not substantially inhibit cell growth of the host cell. The present invention further provides genetically modified host cells that are suitable for use in a subject method. The present invention further provides recombinant nucleic acid constructs for use in generating a subject genetically modified host cell. The present invention further provides methods for identifying variant HMGR polypeptides that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity. The methods generally involve determining the effect, if any, of a test HMGR variant on HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell toxicity. The present invention further provides methods for identifying inhibitors of HMGS. The methods generally involve determining the effect, if any, of a test compound on HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell toxicity.

The present invention is based in part on the unexpected observation that HMG-CoA, an intermediate in the mevalonate pathway, is toxic when it accumulates in a microbial host genetically modified to produce isoprenyl pyrophosphate (IPP) or an IPP precursor via the mevalonate pathway. This observation was made by studying the increased production of isoprenoid compounds (and/or precursors such as mevalonate, IPP, and polyprenyl diphosphates) in host cells (e.g., a host microorganism) that were transformed (“genetically modified”) with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes. Mevalonate pathway enzymes are depicted in FIG. 2. The mevalonate pathway comprises the following enzymatic reactions: (a) condensing two molecules of acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA; (b) condensing acetoacetyl-CoA with acetyl-CoA to form HMG-CoA; (c) converting HMG-CoA to mevalonate; (d) phosphorylating mevalonate to mevalonate 5-phosphate; (e) converting mevalonate 5-phosphate to mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate; and (f) converting mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate to isopentenyl pyrophosphate. The observation that increasing the expression level of the mevalonate pathway resulted in inhibition of cell growth was unexpected.

One can generate isoprenoid compounds (for suitable constructs and methods, see US Patent Publication Nos. 20030148479, and 20040005678; and Martin et al. (2003) Nature Biotech. 21(7):796-802) by expressing the mevalonate pathway in a bacterium. The mevalonate pathway enzymes required for production of IPP vary, depending on the culture conditions. For example, in some embodiments, a host cell that produces isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compounds is one that has been genetically modified with two or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate kinase (MK), phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK), and mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (MPD) (and optionally also isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase); and the host cell is cultured in medium that includes mevalonate. In other embodiments, a host cell that produces isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compounds is one that has been genetically modified with two or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase (HMGS), hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), MK, PMK, and MPD (and optionally also IPP isomerase).

In an effort to increase the levels of isoprenoid production in hosts genetically altered to contain an exogenous mevalonate pathway or in hosts that already contain a native (endogenous) mevalonate pathway, one can increase the level of activity of the individual enzymes in the pathway within the cell. A common tool used to modulate levels of activity of engineered enzymes within a cell is to modulate the rate at which an mRNA encoding the enzyme is transcribed. One can attempt to achieve this goal by changing the promoter (transcription initiation or transcription control sequence) to a stronger promoter.

In host cells expressing the mevalonate pathway, one would generally expect that changing the strength of the promoter controlling expression of the entire mevalonate pathway would change the levels of production of isoprenoids. For example, when changing from a modified lactose-inducible promoter, such as the one found in pBluescript and the pBBR1MCS plasmids, to a stronger promoter, such as a consensus arabinose- or lactose-inducible promoter, one would generally expect the expression of each of the enzymes to increase, thus increasing the levels of isoprenoid production. Because the mevalonate pathway feeds off the abundant cellular precursor acetyl-CoA, production of IPP is not expected to be limited by precursor production. Contrary to what would be expected, it was observed that increasing the expression level of the first half of the mevalonate pathway (i.e., increasing the expression level of acetoacetyl CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR) resulted in inhibition of cell growth, yet the amount of the desired isoprenoid product was not increased.

When introducing a recombinant DNA molecule into an organism for the production of an enzyme, whether that enzyme is to be used catalytically within the cell or purified from the cell, toxic effects can be observed (B. R. Glick. (1995) Biotech Advances. 13(12): 247-261). These effects can be due to utilization of the host's cellular resources, to an unexpected activity of the enzyme or to the accumulation of a toxic intermediate. The latter case may be caused by the increased levels of the final product of the pathway, or be a specific to a single enzyme for which the activity is out of balance with that of the other enzymes in the pathway leading to accumulation of an intermediate to levels that are toxic to the cell. Further, it is difficult to predict a priori at what level metabolites of an introduced pathway will be toxic, or the levels at which they will begin to show toxic effects as chemically similar intermediates can have drastically different intracellular effects.

For example, acetyl-CoA levels can be quite high within a cell, without any toxic effects. Propionyl-CoA has been shown to be toxic to Aspirgillus nidulans grown on glucose (Brock et al. Eur J. Biochem. 271, 3227-3241 (2004)). E. coli engineered for PHA accumulation using a propionyl-coA synthetase do not show apparent propinoyl-CoA induced growth inhibition, and can be grown to high cell densities (Choi, et al. Appl. Environ. Microbio, 65 4363-4368 (1999)). Sensitivity to caffeate, p-coumarate, and ferulate was observed in Acinetobacter strains with a knockout of hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA hydratase/lyase potentially due to Hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA accumulation (Parke et al., Appl. Environ. Microbio. 70, 2974-2983 (2004)). The same reference demonstrated sensitivity to the same three substrates in E. coli upon overexpression of hcaC, potentially due to hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA accumulation. Overproduction of a β-ketoacyl carrier protein synthetase II (KAS II) in E. coli led to the accumulation of malonyl-CoA to levels that inhibited growth. Expression of malonyl-CoA:ACP transacylase, the enzyme catalyzing the conversion of malonyl-CoA to malonyl-ACP, along with KAS II partially relieved this toxicity (Subraluanyam et al. J. Bact. 180 4596-4602 (1998)). The expression of malonyl/methylmalonyl-CoA ligase in E. coli combined with methylmalonate feeding led to accumulations of methylmalonyl-CoA to as much as 90% of the acyl-coA pool. Growth inhibition in this strain was not reported (Murli et al. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol 30 500-509 (2003)).

Most mevalonate pathway containing organisms, Homo sapiens for instance, utilize HMGR as a regulatory point in the production of isoprenoids. To limit isoprenoid production, these organisms reduce HMGR activity, which would naturally promote a build-up of its precursor HMG-CoA. This HMG-CoA build-up would presumably also occur in patients taking cholesterol lowering drugs [(such as the statins Atorvastatin (Lipitor) Fluvastatin (Lescol) Lovastatin (Altocor, Mevacor) Pravastatin (Pravachol) Rosuvastatin (Crestor), and Simvastatin (Zocor)],)), which inhibit the activity of HMGR. The widespread use of statin drugs without systemic toxicity due to HMG-CoA accumulation would indicate that HMG-CoA is a non-toxic metabolite for Homo sapiens.

In the case of toxicity due to expression of mevalonate pathway enzymes, metabolite analysis using liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry linked the growth inhibition phenotype with the accumulation of pathway intermediate, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA). This finding demonstrates that in engineered (“genetically modified”) microbial host cells, the intermediate HMG-CoA can accumulate and cause cell death or prevent the cell from further growth and therefore impede the production of IPP by both limiting cell growth and/or indicating a bottleneck in the flow of carbon to the desired isoprenoids.

The accumulation of HMG-CoA implies that there exists an imbalance between the production of HMG-CoA and the subsequence conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate in the engineered mevalonate pathway. By increasing the total activity of HMG-CoA Reductase (HMGR), which is the enzyme that converts HMG-CoA into mevalonate, this toxicity is overcome, resulting in an increase in production of mevalonate and isoprenoids synthesized from mevalonate. Another way to decrease the accumulation of HMG-CoA is to limit production of HMG-CoA by decreasing the total activity of HMG-CoA synthase (HMGS), which is the enzyme that converts acetoacetyl-CoA to HMG-CoA. Yet another way to decrease the accumulation of HMG-CoA is to decrease the level and/or activity of an enzyme, such as acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, that affects the production of acetoacetyl-CoA, which is the direct precursor of HMG-CoA.

In accordance with the methods of the invention, one can tune the HMG-CoA levels to those that eliminate toxicity and allow proper growth of microbial cells, thus allowing significant increases in isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor production. It is important to note that while tuning the HMG-CoA levels may not lead to an increase in isoprenoid produced per cell and may even lead to a decrease, an increase in cell growth may more than offset such losses, resulting in the production of more isoprenoid in a culture. For example and illustration, if HMGS activities are modified such that levels of HMG-CoA are decreased within the cell and the level of isoprenoid per cell is decrease by 10% but cell growth is doubled the total productivity of the culture (the activity per cell multiplied by the number of cells in the culture) will, in fact, increase. Thus, the production of IPP or an isoprenoid compound can be increased by reducing the level of HMG-CoA Synthase activity and/or by increasing the level of HMG-CoA Reductase activity in the cell.

Modulating (increasing or decreasing) the level of active HMGS and/or HMGR activity in a cell is achievable by: 1) modulating (increasing or decreasing) transcription of a nucleic acid encoding the enzyme; 2) modulating (increasing or decreasing) translation of an mRNA encoding the enzyme; 3) modulating (increasing or decreasing) stability of the mRNA encoding the enzyme; 4) modulating (increasing or decreasing) stability of the enzyme itself; and 5) modulating (increasing or decreasing) enzymatic activity of the enzyme. To reduce or eliminate the toxic effect of HMG-CoA and increase isoprenoid and/or isoprenoid precursor production, the present invention also provides cells, and nucleic acids and expression vectors useful in preparing such cells, in which the mevalonate pathway has been re-designed such that HMG-CoA levels do not become toxic.

Efforts to achieve higher IPP production have focused on the over-expression of putatively rate limiting enzymes including HMGR in cells containing an endogenous mevalonate pathway. See, e.g., Polakowski et al. (1998) Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 49: 67-71 (producing the isoprenoid squalene); Donald et al. (1997) Appl. Env. Microbiol. 63:3341-3344 (producing the isoprenoid squalene); and Jackson et al. (2003) Org. Letters 5:1629-1632 (producing the isoprenoid epi-cedrol). These reports do not discuss relief of HMG-CoA-induced toxicity via expression of HMGR but instead are driven by the observation that in many organisms HMGR is the evolved regulation point for production of isoprenoids in organism that naturally utilize the mevalonate pathway to produce isoprenoids. In these cases, the production of the respective isoprenoid increased three to ten-fold upon overexpression of the HMGR.

The following studies have looked at mevalonate pathway enzymes in E. coli. Hamano et al ((2001) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 65: 1627-1635) reported that attempts to transform E. coli strain DYM1 with a high-copy construct pGEM-MEV, containing a mevalonate pathway cluster from Streptomyces, were unsuccessful. Attempts to transform the same strain with pMW-MEV, a low copy construct containing the same mevalonate pathway cluster, were successful. The authors suggested that high expression of the Streptomyces mevalonate pathway genes in E. coli might be lethal. Wilding et al. (2000) J Bacteriol 182(15): 4319-27) reported that in the presence of mevalonate the gram-positive bacterium S. pneunmoniae, mutants lacking both HMG-CoA synthase and HMG-CoA reductase were viable while mutants lacking just HMG-CoA synthase were non-viable.

Additionally, the present invention provides screening methods for identifying a gene product having HMG-CoA detoxification activity. The methods generally involve a) producing a test cell by introducing into a genetically modified host cell an exogenous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a candidate gene product, wherein the genetically modified host cell produces, in the absence of such exogenous nucleic acid, HMG-CoA at levels effective to inhibit growth of the genetically modified host cell; and b) determining the effect, if any, of expression of the candidate gene product on the growth of the test cell. A reduction in growth inhibition indicates that the exogenous nucleic acid encodes a gene product having sufficient activity to relieve HMG-CoA toxicity.

Additionally, the present invention provides screening methods for identifying compounds that inhibit the accumulation of HMG-CoA. The methods generally involve a) contacting a test cell that produces HMG-CoA at levels effective to inhibit its growth with the test compound; and b) determining the effect on cell growth, if any, of contacting the test compound with the cell. A reduction in growth inhibition indicates that the exogenous compound has sufficient activity to relieve HMG-CoA toxicity.

As mentioned above, most mevalonate pathway containing organisms, Homo sapiens for instance, utilize HMGR as a regulatory point in the production of isoprenoids. To limit isoprenoid production, these organisms reduce HMGR activity, which would cause a build-up of its precursor HMG-CoA. This HMG-CoA build-up would also occur in patients taking cholesterol lowering drugs which inhibit the activity of HMGR.

To aid in an understanding of the present invention, FIGS. 1-3 are provided which figures illustrate schematically biosynthetic pathways leading to isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor production.

FIG. 1 depicts isoprenoid pathways involving modification of isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and/or its isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) by prenyl transferases to generate the polyprenyl diphosphates geranyl diphosphate (GPP), farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), and geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP). GPP and FPP are further modified by terpene synthases to generate monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes, respectively; and GGPP is further modified by terpene synthases to generate diterpenes and carotenoids. IPP and DMAPP are generated by one of two pathways: the mevalonate (MEV) pathway and the 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate (DXP) pathway.

FIG. 2 depicts schematically the MEV pathway, where acetyl CoA is converted via a series of reactions to IPP.

FIG. 3 depicts schematically the DXP pathway, in which pyruvate and D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate are converted via a series of reactions to IPP and DMAPP. Eukaryotic cells other than plant cells use the MEV isoprenoid pathway exclusively to convert acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA) to IPP, which is subsequently isomerized to DMAPP. Plants use both the MEV and the mevalonate-independent, or DXP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Prokaryotes, with some exceptions, use the DXP pathway to produce IPP and DMAPP separately through a branch point.

Methods of Relieving HMG-CoA Toxicity and Enhancing Production Isoprenoids and Isoprenoid Precursors

The present invention provides methods of producing an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor in a host cell that comprises, or is genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway. The methods generally involve modulating the level of HMG-CoA in the cell, such that the level of HMG-CoA is not toxic to the cell and/or does not substantially inhibit cell growth, yet that the level of HMG-CoA provides for enhanced production of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursors by the cell. The methods generally involve culturing a genetically modified host cell in a suitable medium, where the genetically modified host cell is one that is genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding one or more polypeptides that provide for relief or reduction of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition or toxicity. Polypeptides that provide for relief or reduction of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition or toxicity include, but are not limited to, HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR), HMG-CoA synthase (HMGS), and an enzyme affecting the level of acetoactyl-CoA (the precursor of HMG-CoA) or mevalonate. The level of an isoprenoid compound (and/or an isoprenoid precursor downstream of HMG-CoA, such as mevalonate, isoprenyl pyrophosphate (IPP), or a polyprenyl diphosphate) produced in the genetically modified host cell is higher than the level of the isoprenoid compound (and/or an isoprenoid precursor downstream of HMG-CoA, such as mevalonate, IPP, or a polyprenyl diphosphate) produced in a control (“parent”) host cell that is not genetically modified with the one or more nucleic acids encoding HMGS and/or HMGR. The present invention further provides genetically modified host cells that are suitable for use in a subject method. The present invention further provides recombinant nucleic acid constructs for use in generating a subject genetically modified host cell.

In some embodiments, the present invention provides a method for reducing HMG-CoA toxicity and enhancing production of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor via a mevalonate pathway in a host cell, where the host cell produces the isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor via a mevalonate pathway. The method generally involves: (a) genetically modifying the host cell to contain one or more heterologous nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes that, when produced in the cell, reduce HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition, as compared to a control parent host cell that is not genetically modified with said heterologous nucleic acids; and (b) culturing the genetically modified host cell under conditions such that the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is higher than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control parent host cell.

The level of HMG-CoA in a parent host cell is modulated by decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or by increasing the level of HMGR activity in the cell and/or by balancing the level of HMGS activity and HMGR activity such that HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell toxicity is relieved. The level of HMG-CoA in a parent host cell is also modulated by genetic modifications that promote balanced flux of metabolites through the mevalonate pathway, as described in more detail below.

The present invention is applicable to host cells that produce IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway. Such host cells are referred to herein as “parent” host cells and comprise, or are genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway (and therefore produce IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway). Parent host cells exhibit HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, where the level of intracellular HMG-CoA inhibits cell growth, in the absence of an additional genetic modification, as described herein; thus, e.g., a parent host cell is one that, but for a genetic modification as described herein, would accumulate HMG-CoA intracellularly and exhibit HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity. Parent host cells are genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS and that provide for an increased level of HMGR activity and/or a decreased level of HMGS activity in the cell. HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the host cell genetically modified with the one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS is reduced, compared a parent host cell not genetically modified with the one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS. Genetically modifying a host cell with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS results in: a) a decreased level of HMGS activity in the cell; b) an increased level of HMGR activity in the cell; c) a decreased level of HMGS activity and an increased level of HMGR activity in the cell; or d) a balance between the level of HMGS activity and the HMGR activity, such that HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity in the cell is relieved.

Thus, e.g., a “parent” (or “parental”) host cell is genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS. The parent host cell is one that produces IPP via a mevalonate pathway and/or that produces mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway. The parent cell comprises, or is genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway (and produces IPP via the mevalonate pathway and/or produces mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway). The parent cell exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition.

A parent cell that has been genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS, is referred to as a “genetically modified host cell.” HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the genetically modified parent host cell is reduced, compared a parent host cell not genetically modified with the one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS. In addition, production of an isoprenoid or an isoprenoid precursor is increased in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell. Thus, e.g., production of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor is increased by at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 50%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell.

Decreasing the Level of HMGS Activity and/or Increasing the Level of HMGR Activity

In some embodiments, a subject method of decreasing HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell toxicity in a host cell comprises decreasing the level of HMGS activity in the cell and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in the cell. Decreasing the level of HMGS activity in a cell includes decreasing the total amount of HMGS polypeptide within the cell; and decreasing the specific activity of HMGS polypeptide within the cell. Thus, in some embodiments, the level of HMGS activity in a cell is decreased by decreasing the total amount of HMGS in the cell. In other embodiments, the level of HMGS activity in a cell is decreased by decreasing the specific activity of HMGS in the cell. Similarly, increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell includes increasing the total amount of HMGR polypeptide within the cell; and increasing the specific activity of HMGR polypeptide within the cell. Thus, in some embodiments, the level of HMGR activity in a cell is increase by increasing the total amount of HMGR in the cell. In other embodiments, the level of HMGR activity in a cell is increased by increasing the specific activity of HMGR in the cell.

Decreasing the level of HMGS activity in a cell is achieved in a number of ways, including, but not limited to: 1) decreasing transcription of a nucleic acid encoding HMGS; 2) decreasing translation of an mRNA encoding HMGS; 3) decreasing stability of the mRNA encoding HMGS; 4) decreasing stability of the HMGS polypeptide; and 5) decreasing enzymatic activity of the HMGS enzyme. Increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell is achieved in a number of ways, including, but not limited to: 1) increasing transcription of a nucleic acid encoding HMGR; 2) increasing translation of an mRNA encoding HMGR; 3) increasing stability of the mRNA encoding HMGR; 4) increasing stability of the HMGR enzyme; and 5) increasing enzymatic activity of the HMGR enzyme.

Thus, in some embodiments of the invention, the desired non-toxic level of HMG-CoA is achieved with through modulation of both HMG-CoA synthase and HMG-CoA reductase activity in the cell. In one embodiment, the parent host cell is a naturally occurring yeast cell, or an E. coli host cell, that is genetically modified with a vector or vectors that contain HMGS and HMGR coding sequences. The encoded HMGS and HMGR enzymes are produced in the cell so that toxic levels of HMG-CoA are not reached and optimum flux through the pathway is achieved, providing high yields of the desired products (isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound). In one embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding regions are controlled by different promoters. In another embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding sequences are on different vectors, with the HMGS coding sequence optionally located on a lower copy number vector. In one embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding sequences are on the same operon, but the HMGR coding sequence is located upstream of the HMGS coding sequence, and this arrangement is different from a naturally occurring operon containing both HMGS and HMGR coding sequences.

In some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell reduces the level of HMG-CoA in the cell such that the toxicity and/or growth inhibition of the HMG-CoA level is reduced. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell reduces the level of HMG-CoA by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, compared to a control parent cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. The level of HMG-CoA in a cell is readily determined using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the like.

In some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell reduces growth inhibition by HMG-CoA accumulation in the cell. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell reduces HMG-CoA accumulation-mediated growth inhibition by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, compared to a control cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. Growth of genetically modified host cells is readily determined using well-known methods, e.g., optical density (OD) measurement at about 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of liquid cultures of bacteria; colony size; growth rate; and the like.

In one exemplary embodiment, a control parent cell is a prokaryotic host cell that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, where HMG-CoA is produced and accumulates intracellularly at levels that are growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR in a single polycistronic operon in the recited order on a plasmid or in the chromosome; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising the nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGR, and HMGS in a single polycistronic operon in the adjusted recited order on a plasmid or in the chromosome. As an additional non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR in a single polycistronic operon in the recited order on a medium copy plasmid; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGS in the recited order on a low copy plasmid, and a nucleotide sequence HMGR on a separate high copy plasmid. As an additional non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR in a single polycistronic operon in the recited order on a medium copy plasmid; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGS in the recited order on a medium copy plasmid in which the ribosome binding site has been altered to reduce translation, and a nucleotide sequence HMGR on a separate medium copy plasmid for which the promoter has been changed to a stronger version. As an additional non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR in a single polycistronic operon in the recited order on a medium copy plasmid; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS with a engineered protease site, and HMGR to which a highly soluble protein such as glutathione transferase has been fused in the recited order on a medium copy plasmid.

Genetic alteration resulting in changes to the amino acid sequence of proteins, such as those recited above, will result in changes in the relative catalytic activity (as measured by Vmax or Vmax/Km) of AMOS and HMGR. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity results in an increase of the ratio of HMGR catalytic activity to HMGS catalytic activity on a per cell basis of HMGR at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, than HMGS in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell. Growth of genetically modified host cells is readily determined using well-known methods, e.g., optical density (OD) measurement at about 600 nm (OD₆₀₀) of liquid cultures of bacteria; colony size; growth rate; and the like.

In another embodiment, the control parent cell is a eukaryotic cell, e.g., a yeast cell such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In some of these embodiments, the control parent eukaryotic cell comprises one Or more mutations in the endogenous pyruvate decarboxylase gene, such that the pyruvate decarboxylase gene is functionally disabled, and such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly at a level that is growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell. In practicing the invention, the control parent cell is further modified with modifications to the nucleic acid encoding HMGR or its control elements which increase transcription, translation, or specific activity levels, creating the genetically modified host cell. In one embodiment, the control parent cell is further modified through the introduction of HMGR on a plasmid under the control of an inducible promoter.

Modifications that Reduce HMG-CoA Accumulation by Decreasing the Level of Activity of HMG-CoA Synthase

Those of skill in the art will appreciate, upon contemplation of this disclosure, that the level of HMG-CoA depends, at least in part, on the level of HMGS activity in the cell. The aforementioned decreases in HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition and/or decreases in intracellular HMG-CoA levels are in some embodiments achieved through modulation of HMGS activity levels in the cell. Thus, in some embodiments, relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity and/or a non-toxic level of HMG-CoA is achieved via modulation of the level of HMG-CoA synthase activity in the cell. In these embodiments, a parent host cell that comprises, or is genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway (and produces IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway) is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid heterologous to the host cell, where the nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS, where HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the host cell genetically modified with the heterologous nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGS is reduced, compared to a parent host cell not genetically modified with the heterologous nucleic acid comprising, nucleotide sequences encoding HMGS.

In one embodiment, the heterologous HMGS-encoding nucleic acid is used to replace all or a part of an endogenous HMGS gene. In another embodiment, the parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified to contain an exogenous HMGS gene; and the exogenous HMGS gene of the parent host cell is replaced by a modified HMGS gene that provides for a lower level of HMGS activity, e.g., the amount of HMGS and/or the activity of the HMGS is lower than in the parent host cell. In another embodiment, the heterologous nucleic acid that reduces the HMGS activity level encodes an HMGS inhibitor or an anti-sense RNA that reduces translation of the HMGS transcript. In both cases, while the modified host cell's specific isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor production rate may decrease when compared to the parent strain, the resulting relief in HMG-CoA associated growth inhibition would lead to greater cell densities, resulting in an overall increase in production.

In some embodiments, a heterologous nucleic acid is introduced into a parent host cell, and the heterologous nucleic acid recombines with an endogenous nucleic acid encoding HMGS, thereby genetically modifying the parent host cell. In some embodiments, the heterologous nucleic acid comprises a promoter that has reduced promoter strength compared to the endogenous promoter that controls transcription of the endogenous HMGS, and the recombination event results in substitution of the endogenous promoter with the heterologous promoter. In other embodiments, the heterologous nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding an HMGS that exhibits reduced enzymatic activity compared to the endogenous HMGS, and the recombination event results in substitution of the endogenous HMGS coding sequence with the heterologous HMGS coding sequence.

A genetically modified host cell suitable for use in a subject method is genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids, including a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS, such that the level of HMGS activity in the cell is decreased. The level of HMGS activity is decreased in the cell by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 10%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, compared to a parent host cell not genetically modified with the one or more nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS. The parent host cell exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition.

In one exemplary embodiment, a control parent cell is a prokaryotic host cell that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, where HMG-CoA is produced and accumulates intracellularly at levels that are growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising a modified version of the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 in which the ribosome binding site upstream of HMGS has been altered such that translation is reduced. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising a modified version of the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 in which a RNase site has been introduced into the coding region of HMGS. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:2. See, e.g., FIG. 5 and Example 2. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with expression construct(s) comprising the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:8.

In another embodiment, the control parent cell is a eukaryotic cell, e.g., a yeast cell such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In some of these embodiments, the control parent eukaryotic cell comprises one or more mutations in the endogenous pyruvate decarboxylase gene, such that the pyruvate decarboxylase gene is functionally disabled, and such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly at a level that is growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell.

The level of HMGS activity in the genetically modified host cell can be decreased in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, 1) decreasing the promoter strength of the promoter to which the HMGS coding region is operably linked; 2) decreasing the copy number of the plasmid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS; 3) decreasing the stability of an HMGS mRNA (where an “HMGS mRNA” is an mRNA comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS); 4) modifying the sequence of the ribosome binding site of an HMGS mRNA such that the level of translation of the HMGS mRNA is decreased; 5) modifying the distance and/or sequence between the ribosome binding site of the HMGS mRNA and start codon of the HMGS coding sequence, such that the level of translation of the HMGS mRNA is decreased; 6) modifying the entire intercistronic region 5′ of the start codon of the HMGS coding sequence such that the level of translation of the HMGS mRNA is decreased; 7) modifying the codon usage of HMGS such that the level of translation of the HMGS mRNA is decreased; 8) decreasing the enzyme stability of HMGS; 9) decreasing the specific activity (units activity per unit protein) of HMGS; and 10) where HMGS is encoded on an operon, changing the order of the coding regions on the polycistronic mRNA. Two or more of the aforementioned modifications can be made, in order to decrease the level of HMGS activity in the genetically modified host cell.

In some embodiments, the level of HMGS activity is decreased relative to the HMGS activity in a control parent cell by using a low-copy number plasmid, which plasmid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS. Decreasing the plasmid copy number of a vector comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS is achieved by selecting a plasmid backbone that is known to be a low copy number plasmid. Low copy number plasmids generally provide for fewer than about 20 plasmid copies per cell, e.g., from about 5 plasmid copies per cell to about 20 plasmid copies per cell. Suitable low copy number plasmids include, but are not limited to, pACYC184, pBR1332, pBAD33, pBBR1MCS, and pSC101. For example, pSC101 is generally present in a cell at about 5 copies per cell. In one embodiment of the invention, the AMOS and HMGR levels are modulated by placing the two genes on two different expression vectors, such that the HMGS coding sequence is on a low copy vector and the HMGR coding sequence is on a high copy vector. In another embodiment of the invention, the genes are on the same vector but under the control of different promoters, with the HMGS coding sequence being under the control of the weaker of the two promoters.

Modifications that Reduce Intracellular HMG-CoA Accumulation by Increasing the Level of HMG-CoA Reductase Activity

Those of skill in the art will appreciate, upon contemplation of this disclosure, that the level of HMG-CoA depends, at least in part, on the level of HMGR activity in the cell. The aforementioned decreases in HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition and/or decreases in intracellular HMG-CoA levels can be achieved in accordance with the methods of the invention by modulating HMGR activity levels in the cell. Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, a non-toxic level of HMG-CoA and/or relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity is achieved with through modulation of the level of HMG-CoA reductase activity in the cell. In these embodiments, a parent host cell that comprises, or is genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway, and produces IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway, is genetically modified to include a nucleic acid heterologous to the host cell, where the nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR, where HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the host cell genetically modified with the heterologous nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR is reduced, compared to a control parent host cell not genetically modified with the heterologous nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR.

A genetically modified host cell suitable for use in a subject method is genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids, including a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR, such that the level of HMGR activity in the cell is increased. The level of HMGR activity is increased in the cell by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, compared to a control parent cell not genetically modified with the one or more nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR.

In one exemplary embodiment, a control parent cell is a prokaryotic host cell that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, where HMG-CoA is produced and accumulates intracellularly at levels that are growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell. In one embodiment, a control parent cell is a prokaryotic host cell that does not naturally contain a mevalonate pathway and that has been genetically modified to produce mevalonate; and the genetically modified host cell is further engineered to alter HMGR activity such that intracellular levels of HMG-CoA are not inhibitory or toxic to the cell. In one exemplary embodiment, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified to produce mevalonate; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified version of the control parent cell augmented with constructs other than those listed in the following references: Kato-Emori et al. Mol Genet Genomics (2001) 265:135-42, Learned R M, et al. PNAS. (1989) 86:2779-83, T. Dairi, et al. Mol Gen Genet (2000) 262: 957-964, Allen, et al. Appl Environ. Microbio. (1997). 63:3341-3344, Hedl, et al. J. Bacteriol. (2002), 184:2116-2122, Jackson, et al. Org. Lett. (2003) 5:1629-1632, Randolph Y. Hampton, et al. (1994) Cell, 125:299-312, Markus Veen, et al. FEMS Yeast Res (2003) 4:87-95, Beach M J, et al. J Bacteriol (1989) 171:2994-3001, Bischoff K M, et al. Protein Sci (1997) 6:156-161, Friesen J A, et al. Biochemistry. (1997) 36:2173-7, Frimpong, et al. J Biol Chem. (1994) 269:11478-83, Panda, et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2004) 66: 143-152.

As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with the expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:8. See, e.g., FIGS. 6 and 7 and Examples 3 and 4. As one non-limiting example, a control parent cell is an E. coli host cell that has been genetically modified with an expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2; and the genetically modified host cell is an E. coli genetically modified with the expression construct comprising the nucleotide sequences set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 and SEQ ID NO:9. See, e.g., FIG. 10 and Example 6.

In another embodiment. the control parent cell is a eukaryotic cell, e.g., a yeast cell such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In some of these embodiments, the control parent eukaryotic cell comprises one or more mutations in the endogenous pyruvate decarboxylase gene, such that the pyruvate decarboxylase gene is functionally disabled, and such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly at a level that is growth inhibiting or toxic to the cell.

The level of HMGR activity in the genetically modified host cell can be increased in a number of ways, including, but not limited to, 1) increasing the promoter strength of the promoter to which the HMGR coding region is operably linked; 2) increasing the copy number of the plasmid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR; 3) increasing the stability of an HMGR mRNA (where an “HMGR mRNA” is an mRNA comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR); 4) modifying the sequence of the ribosome binding site of an HMGR mRNA such that the level of translation of the HMGR mRNA is increased; 5) modifying the sequence between the ribosome binding site of an HMGR mRNA and the start codon of the HMGR coding sequence such that the level of translation of the HMGR mRNA is increased; 6) modifying the entire intercistronic region 5′ of the start codon of the HAM R coding region such that translation of the HMGR mRNA is increased; 7) modifying the codon usage of HMGR such that the level of translation of the HMGR mRNA is increased, 8) expressing rare codon tRNAs used in HMGR such that the level of translation of the HMGR mRNA is increased; 9) increasing the enzyme stability of HMGR; or 10) increasing the specific activity (units activity per unit protein) of HMGR. Two or more of the foregoing modifications may be made to provide for an increased level of HMGR activity.

In the nucleotide sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:2, the HMGR coding region is under transcriptional control of the p_(BAD) promoter. In some embodiments, the promoter to which the HMGR coding region is operably linked is a stronger promoter than the p_(BAD) promoter, e.g., the level of mRNA transcribed is at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, or more, higher than the level of mRNA transcribed using the p_(BAD) promoter. Suitable promoters include, but are not limited to, a consensus lac promoter, a trp promoter, a tac promoter, a trc promoter, a lambda promoter, and a T7 promoter.

Increasing the plasmid copy number is achieved by selecting a plasmid backbone that is known to be a medium or high copy number plasmid. Low copy number plasmids generally provide for fewer than about 20 plasmid copies per cell. Medium copy number plasmids generally provide for from about 20 plasmid copies per cell to about 50 plasmid copies per cell, or from about 20 plasmid copies per cell to about 80 plasmid copies per cell. High copy number plasmids generally provide for from about 80 plasmid copies per cell to about 200 plasmid copies per cell, or more. In many embodiments, a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR is a high copy number plasmid vector comprising a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR. Suitable high copy number plasmids include, but are not limited to, pUC vectors (e.g.: pUC8, pUC18, pUC19, and the like), pBluescript vectors, pGEM vectors, and pTZ vectors.

Those of skill in the art will appreciate, upon contemplation of this disclosure, that the level of HMG-CoA in a cell can be modified by modulating relative levels of HMGS and HMGR activities in the cell. Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, the desired non-toxic level of HMG-CoA is achieved with through modulation of both HMG-CoA synthase and HMG-CoA reductase activity in the cell. In one embodiment, the parent host cell is a naturally occurring yeast or E. coli host cell that is genetically modified with a vector or vectors that contain HMGS and HMGR coding sequences. The encoded HMGS and HMGR enzymes are produced in the cell so that toxic levels of HMG-CoA are not reached and optimum flux through the pathway is achieved, providing high yields of the desired products (isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound). In one embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding regions are controlled by different promoters. In another embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding sequences are on different vectors, with the HMGS coding sequence optionally located on a lower copy number vector. In one embodiment, the HMGS and HMGR coding sequences are on the same operon, but the HMGR coding sequence is located upstream of the HMGS coding sequence, and this arrangement is different from a naturally occurring operon containing both HMGS and HMGR coding sequences.

Modifications that Reduce HMG-CoA Accumulation by Balancing the Flux Through the Mevalonate Pathway

In some embodiments, HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition or toxicity is reduced by balancing the metabolite flow through the pathway. Metabolite flux can be balanced in a number of ways, including, but not limited to 1) mutations in enzymes upstream (ie, AtoB, AtoC, AtoA, AtoD) of HMGS that limit the substrate (AcetoAcetyl-CoA) available to the enzyme; 2) changes in expression of enzymes upstream (for example, AtoC, AtoA, AtoD, and enzymes involved in fatty acid biosynthesis) of UMGS that limit the substrate (acetoacetyl-CoA) available to the enzyme; 3) changes in expression of enzymes downstream (ie, MK, PMK, MVD) of HMGR that deplete the supply of mevalonate and thus promote conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate; 4) mutations that change the catalytic characteristics enzymes downstream (ie, MK, PMK, MVD) of HMGR that deplete the supply of mevalonate and thus promote conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate; 5) protein fusions of HMGR with an upstream enzyme (i.e. acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS,) to match expression of an HMG-CoA production enzyme to HMGR; 6) protein fusions of HMGS with an downstream enzyme (i.e. MK) to match expression of an HMG-CoA production enzyme to an enzyme responsible for metabolite movement away from HMG-CoA.

Increasing Isoprenoid or Isoprenoid Precursor Production

The above-described methods result in relief from HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity and/or cell growth inhibition in a cell; and provide for increased production of an isoprenoid compound and/or an isoprenoid precursor compound in the cell. Thus, the present invention provides methods for increasing production of an isoprenoid compound or an isoprenoid precursor compound in a cell, where the methods generally involve modulating the levels of HMG-CoA in the cell such that the levels of HMG-CoA remain below a toxic or growth inhibitory level, and yet are at a level that is high enough to provide for increased production of an isoprenoid compound or an isoprenoid precursor compound.

The present invention provides methods for increasing production of an isoprenoid compound, or an isoprenoid compound precursor (e.g., mevalonate, IPP, a polyprenyl disphosphate, etc.) by a cell or cultures of a cell. The methods generally involve increasing the level of HMGR activity, and/or decreasing the level of HMGS activity, in a cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition. A cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition is in some embodiments a parent host cell that does not normally synthesize IPP or mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, and that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate pathway enzyme(s), which enzymes are produced at levels that result in accumulation of toxic or growth inhibiting levels of HMG-CoA in the cell. A cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition is in some embodiments a parent host cell that does normally synthesize IPP or mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, but that is genetically modified such that intracellular HMG-CoA accumulates at growth inhibiting or toxic levels. In one embodiment, the compound is the isoprenoid precursor compound IPP. In one embodiments the host cell is an E. coli cell. In another embodiment, the host cell is a yeast cell.

In some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases mevalonate production by the genetically modified host cell, or by a culture of the genetically modified host cell. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases mevalonate production by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell. Mevalonate production is readily determined using well-known methods, e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, ion chromatography-mass spectrometry, thin layer chromatography, pulsed amperometric detection, uv-vis spectrometry, and the like.

In some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases IPP production by the genetically modified host cell, or by a culture of the genetically modified host cell. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases IPP production by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell. IPP production is readily determined using well-known methods, e.g., liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, thin layer chromatography, ion chromatography-mass spectrometry, pulsed amperometric detection, uv-vis spectrometry, and the like.

In some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases isoprenoid production by the genetically modified host cell. Thus, in some embodiments, decreasing the level of HMGS activity and/or increasing the level of HMGR activity in a cell increases mevalonate production by at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, in the genetically modified host cell, compared to the parent host cell. Isoprenoid production is readily determined using well-known methods, e.g., gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, ion chromatography-mass spectrometry, pulsed amperometric detection, uv-vis spectrometry, and the like.

In some embodiments, a subject method provides for enhanced production of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor per cell, e.g., the amount of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound produced using a subject method is at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, higher than the amount of the isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound produced by a control parent cell, on a per cell basis. Amount of cells measured by measuring dry cell weight or measuring optical density of the cell culture.

In other embodiments, a subject method provides for enhanced production of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor per unit volume of cell culture, e.g.,, the amount of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound produced using a subject method is at least about 10%, at least about 15%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, at least about 20-fold, at least about 30-fold, at least about 40-fold, at least about 50-fold, at least about 75-fold, at least about 100-fold, at least about 200-fold, at least about 300-fold, at least about 400-fold, or at least about 500-fold, or more, higher than the amount of the isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor compound produced by a control parent cell, on a per unit volume of cell culture basis.

In some embodiments, a subject method for increasing production of an isoprenoid compound or an isoprenoid precursor compound comprises modulating the composition of the medium in which a host cell is cultured, such that the level of a mevalonate pathway intermediate (e.g., acetyl-CoA) is increased. In some embodiments. the culture medium comprises acetate, which increases the level of acetyl-CoA, and which in turn increases the level of HMG-CoA in the cell.

Isoprenoids that can be produced using the method of the invention include, but are not limited to, monoterpenes, including but not limited to, limonene, citranellol, geraniol, menthol, perillyl alcohol, linalool, thujone; sesquiterpenes, including but not limited to, periplanone B, gingkolide B, amorphadiene, artemisinin, artemisinic acid, valencene, nootkatone, epi-cedrol, epi-aristolochene, farnesol, gossypol, sanonin, periplanone, and forskolin; diterpenes, including but not limited to, casbene, eleutherobin, paclitaxel, prostratin, and pseudopterosin; triterpenes, including but not limited to, arbrusidee, bruceantin, testosterone, progesterone, cortisone, digitoxin. Isoprenoids also include, but are not limited to, carotenoids such as lycopene, α- and β-carotene, α- and β-cryptoxanthin, bixin, zeaxanthin, astaxanthin, and lutein. Isoprenoids also include, but are not limited to, triterpenes, steroid compounds, and compounds that are composed of isoprenoids modified by other chemical groups, such as mixed terpene-alkaloids, and coenzyme Q-10.

Genetically Modified Host Cells

The present invention provides genetically modified host cells; and compositions comprising the genetically modified host cells. The genetically modified host cells are useful for producing an isoprenoid compound or an isoprenoid precursor compound, as discussed above.

As discussed above, a subject method for producing an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor generally involves culturing a genetically modified host cell in a suitable medium. The genetically modified host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes that, when produced in the cell, relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition (toxicity) in the cell. The parent cell (e.g., the cell not genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes that, when produced in the cell, relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition and/or toxicity in the cell) is a cell that produces, or is genetically modified to produce, IPP via a mevalonate pathway.

Thus, e.g., a “parent” (or “parental”) host cell is genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS. The parent host cell produces IPP via a mevalonate pathway and/or produces mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway. The parent cell comprises, or is genetically modified to comprise, nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway (and produces IPP via the mevalonate pathway and/or produces mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway). A parent cell that has been genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids heterologous to the host cell, where the one or more nucleic acids comprise nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS, is referred to as a “genetically modified host cell.” HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the genetically modified parent host cell is reduced, compared a parent host cell not genetically modified with the one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR and/or HMGS. Further the genetically modified host cell exhibits increased levels of mevalonate or isoprenoid products derived from a combination of increased per cell production of mevalonate and/or increased cell viability. It is understood that this invention can be iteratively applied to incrementally increase production of isoprenoid compounds so that in one context a particular cell line may be a genetically modified host cell and then in a later context it may be a parent host cell utilized as a starting point for further improvement. Alternately, this invention teaches of the toxicity of HMG-CoA accumulation and allows the de novo construction of genetic systems and associated host cells that avoid HMG-CoA toxicity otherwise associated with high-level isoprenoid production. Thus, if a genetically modified host cell can be further genetically modified to produce a cell that exhibits decreased cell viability due to HMG-CoA accumulation the further genetically modified cell will in fact be a parent host cell with respect to the initial genetically modified host cell.

In some embodiments, the parent cell is a cell that does not normally produce IPP or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway; e.g., the parent cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway. As an example, a parent cell is a prokaryotic cell that does not normally produce IPP or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway, and that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, where the levels of acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGS activity are such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly at a level that is growth inhibiting or toxic. An example is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:1. A second example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:2.

In other embodiments, the parent cell is a cell that normally produces IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway, e.g., the parent cell is a cell that comprises endogenous nucleic acids encoding one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway. In these embodiments, the parent cell is genetically modified such that the level of HMG-CoA that accumulates intracellularly is toxic or growth inhibiting to the cell. As an example, one or more mutations are introduced in a pyruvate decarboxylase gene of the host cell that normally produces IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway, such that the pyruvate decarboxylase gene is functionally disabled, and such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly at a level that is toxic to the cell. The parent cell in this case is a host cell that normally produces IPP and/or mevalonate via the mevalonate pathway, and that has been genetically modified to introduce one or more mutations in the endogenous pyruvate decarboxylase gene such that the pyruvate decarboxylase gene is functionally disabled.

To generate a subject genetically modified host cell, one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding an enzyme(s) that relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition is introduced stably or transiently into a parent host cell, using established techniques, including, but not limited to, electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, DEAE-dextran mediated transfection, liposome-mediated transfection, and the like. For stable transformation, a nucleic acid will generally further include a selectable marker, e.g., any of several well-known selectable markers such as neomycin resistance, ampicillin resistance, tetracycline resistance, chloramphenicol resistance, kanamycin resistance, and the like.

Mevalonate Pathway Enzymes

As noted above, a parent cell is a host cell that produces, or is genetically modified to produce, IPP via a mevalonate pathway and/or mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, and that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity or growth inhibition. The mevalonate pathway comprises: (a) condensing two molecules of acetyl-CoA to acetoacetyl-CoA; (b) condensing acetoacetyl-CoA with acetyl-CoA to form HMG-CoA; (c) converting HMG-CoA to mevalonate; (d) phosphorylating, mevalonate to mevalonate 5-phosphate; (e) converting mevalonate 5-phosphate to mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate; and (f) converting mevalonate 5-pyrophosphate to isopentenyl pyrophosphate. The mevalonate pathway enzymes required for production of IPP vary, depending on the culture conditions.

In some embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, and the parent host cell is one that produces mevalonate. An non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 or a nucleotide sequence encoding enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:1 A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 or a nucleotide sequence encoding enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:2 A further non-limiting, example of a parent host cell is an yeast cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:7 or a nucleotide sequence encoding enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:7. A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with one or more constructs comprising nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:6 or nucleotide sequences that encode enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:6. A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with one or more constructs comprising the nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:7 or nucleotide sequences that encode enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:7. A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with one or more constructs comprising nucleotide sequences as set forth in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:11 or nucleotide sequences that encode enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:11. A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is a yeast cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence comprising the mevalonate pathway genes encoded in SEQ ID NO:6 and SEQ ID NO:7 or a nucleotide sequence encoding enzymes functionally analogous to those mevalonate pathway enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:6 and SEQ ID NO:7. A further non-limiting example of a parent host cell is an yeast cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence comprising mevalonate pathway enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:11 or a nucleotide sequence encoding enzymes functionally analogous to those enzymes encoded in SEQ ID NO:11.

In other embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetyoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, HMGR, mevalonate kinase (MK), phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK), and mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (MPD) (and optionally also IPP isomerase). An example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:2 and SEQ ID NO: 4. A further example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:3 and SEQ ID NO: 4.

In some embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate kinase (MK), phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK), and mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase (MPD) (and optionally also isopentenyl pyrophosphate isomerase); and the parent host cell is cultured in medium that includes mevalonate.

In other embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase (HMGS), hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), MK, PMK, and MPD (and optionally. also IPP isomerase).

In other embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding MK, PMK, MPD, IPP isomerase, and a prenyl transferase. In other embodiments, a parent host cell is one that is genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, HMGR, MK, PMK, MPD, IPP isomerase, and a prenyl transferase. An example of a parent host cell is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 5. A further example is an E. coli cell that has been genetically modified with a construct comprising a nucleotide sequence as set forth in SEQ ID NO: 1 and SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 5.

In other embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has a native (endogenous) mevalonate pathway and has been Genetically modified such that the level of HMG-CoA is increased relative to an unmodified host cell, and such that HMG-CoA accumulation causes growth inhibition. In an exemplary embodiment, the parent strain is Saccharomyces cerevisiae that has been Genetically modified for increased acetyl-CoA production, by introducing one or more genetic modifications such that one or more of a phosphotransacetylase, lactate dehydrogenase, and pyruvate decarboxylase is functionally disabled (e.g., via knockout).

Host cells (including parent host cells and genetically modified host cells) are in many embodiments unicellular organisms, or are grown in culture as single cells. In some embodiments, the host cell is a eukaryotic cell. Suitable eukaryotic host cells include, but are not limited to, yeast cells, insect cells, plant cells, fungal cells, and algal cells. Suitable eukaryotic host cells include, but are not limited to, Pichia pastoris, Pichia finlandica, Pichia trehalophila, Pichia koclamae, Pichia membranaefaciens, Pichia opuntiae, Pichia thermotolerans, Pichia salictaria, Pichia guercuunm, Pichia pijperi, Pichia stiptis, Pichia methanolica, Pichia sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces sp., Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, Candida albicans, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Trichoderma reesei, Chrysosporium lucknowense, Fusarium sp., Fusarium gramineum, Fusarium venenatum, Neurospora crassa, Chiamydoinonas reinhardti, and the like. In some embodiments, the host cell is a eukaryotic cell other than a plant cell.

In other embodiments, the host cell is a prokaryotic cell. Suitable prokaryotic cells include, but are not limited to, any of a variety of laboratory strains of Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus sp., Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., and the like. See, e.g., Carrier et al. (1992) J. Immunol. 148:1176-1181; U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,784; and Sizemore et al. (1995) Science 270:299-302. Examples of Salmonella strains which can be employed in the present invention include, but are not limited to, Salmonella typhi and S. typhimurium. Suitable Shigella strains include, but are not limited to, Shigella flexneri, Shigella sonnei, and Shigella disenteriae. Typically, the laboratory strain is one that is non-patholgenic. Non-limiting examples of other suitable bacteria include, but are not limited to, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas pudita, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas mevalonii, Rhodobacter sphaeroides, Rhodohacter capsulatus, Rhodospirillum rubrum, Rhodococcus sp., and the like. In some embodiments, the host cell is Escherichia coli.

As noted above, in some embodiments, a parent host cell is one that has been genetically modified with one or more heterologous nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate pathway enzyme(s). To genetically modify a parent host cell such that it produces IPP via a mevalonate pathway and/or that produces mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes is introduced stably or transiently into a host cell, using established techniques, including, but not limited to, electroporation, calcium phosphate precipitation, DEAE-dextran mediated transfection, liposome-mediated transfection, and the like. For stable transformation, a nucleic acid will generally further include a selectable marker, e.g., any of several well-known selectable markers such as neomycin resistance, ampicillin resistance, tetracycline resistance, chloramphenicol resistance, kanamycin resistance, and the like.

In many embodiments, the nucleic acid with which the host cell is genetically modified such that it produces IPP and/or mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway is an expression vector that includes a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a mevalonate pathway enzyme(s). Similarly, in many embodiments, the nucleic acid with which a parent host cell is genetically modified, such that HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity and/or cell growth inhibition is reduced, is an expression vector that includes a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes one or more enzymes that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity and/or cell growth inhibition. Suitable expression vectors include, but are not limited to, baculovirus vectors, bacteriophage vectors, plasmids, phagemids, cosmids, fosmids, bacterial artificial chromosomes, viral vectors (e.g. viral vectors based on vaccinia virus, poliovirus, adenovirus, adeno-associated virus, SV40, herpes simplex virus, and the like), P1-based artificial chromosomes, yeast plasmids, yeast artificial chromosomes, and any other vectors specific for specific hosts of interest (such as E. colt and yeast). Thus, for example, a nucleic acid encoding a mevalonate pathway gene product(s) is included in any one of a variety of expression vectors for expressing the mevalonate pathway gene product(s). Such vectors include chromosomal, nonchromosomal and synthetic DNA sequences.

Numerous suitable expression vectors are known to those of skill in the art, and many are commercially available. The following vectors are provided by way of example; for bacterial host cells: pQE vectors (Qiagen), pBluescript plasmids, pNH vectors, lambda-ZAP vectors (Stratagene); pTrc99a, pKK223-3, pDR540, and pRIT2T (Pharmacia); for eukaryotic host cells: pXT1, pSG5 (Stratagene), pSVK3, pBPV, pMSG, and pSVLSV40 (Pharmacia). However, any other plasmid or other vector may be used so long as it is compatible with the host cell.

For generating a parent host cell comprising one or more heterologous nucleic acids encoding nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate pathway enzymes, a mevalonate pathway enzyme-encoding nucleotide sequence is inserted into an expression vector. The mevalonate pathway enzyme-encoding nucleotide sequence in the expression vector is operably linked to an appropriate expression control sequence(s) (e.g., apromoter) to direct synthesis of the encoded gene product. Similarly, for generating a genetically modified host cell from a parent host cell, an expression vector comprising nucleotide sequences encoding, e.g., HMGS and/or HMGR, will be used. The HMGS and/or HMGR coding sequences are operably linked to appropriate expression control sequence(s) to direct synthesis of the encoded gene product. Depending on the host/vector system utilized, any of a number of suitable transcription and translation control elements, including constitutive and inducible promoters, transcription enhancer elements, transcription terminators, etc. may be used in the expression vector (see e.g., Bitter et al. (1987) Methods in Enzymology, 153:516-544).

Suitable promoters for use in prokaryotic host cells include, but are not limited to, a bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase promoter; a trp promoter; a lac operon promoter; a hybrid promoter, e.g., a lac/tac hybrid promoter, a tac/trc hybrid promoter, a trp/lac promoter, a T7/lac promoter; a trc promoter; a tac promoter, and the like; an araBAD promoter; in vivo regulated promoters, such as an ssaG promoter or a related promoter (see, e.g., U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040131637), a pagC promoter (Pulkkinen and Miller, J. Bacteriol., 1991: 173(1): 86-93; Alpuche-Aranda et al., PNAS, 1992; 89(21): 10079-83), a nirB promoter (Harborne et al. (1992) Mol. Micro. 6:2805-2813), and the like (see, e.g., Dunstan et al. (1999) Infect Immun. 67:5133-5141; McKelvie et al. (2004) Vaccine 22:3243-3255; and Chatfield et al. (1992) Biotechnol, 10:888-892); a sigma70 promoter, e.g., a consensus sigma70 promoter (see, e.g., GenBank Accession Nos. AX798980, AX798961, and AX798183); a stationary phase promoter, e.g., a dps promoter, an spv promoter, and the like; a promoter derived from the pathogenicity island SPI-2 (see, e.g., WO96/17951); an actA promoter (see, e.g., Shetron-Rama et al. (2002) Infect. Immun. 70:1087-1096); an rpsM promoter (see, e.g., Valdivia and Falkow (1996). Mol. Microbiol. 22:367-378); a ret promoter (see, e.g., Hillen, W. and Wissmann, A. (1989) In Saenger, W. and Heinemann, U. (eds), Topics in Molecular and Structural Biology, Protein-Nucleic Acid Interaction. Macmillan, London, UK, Vol. 10, pp. 143-162); an SP6 promoter (see, e.g., Melton et al. (1984) Nucl. Acids Res. 12:7035-7056); and the like.

Non-limiting examples of suitable eukaryotic promoters include CMV immediate early, HSV thymidine kinase, early and late SV40, LTRs from retrovirus, and mouse metallothionein-I. Selection of the appropriate vector and promoter is well within the level of ordinary skill in the art. The expression vector may also contain a ribosome binding site for translation initiation and a transcription terminator. The expression vector may also include appropriate sequences for amplifying expression.

In addition, the expression vectors will in many embodiments contain one or more selectable marker genes to provide a phenotypic trait for selection of transformed host cells such as dihydrofolate reductase or neomycin resistance for eukaryotic cell culture, or such as tetracycline or ampicillin resistance in prokaryotic host cells such as E. coli.

Generally, recombinant expression vectors will include origins of replication and selectable markers permitting transformation of the host cell, e.g., the ampicillin resistance gene of E. coli, the S. cerevisiae TRP1 gene, etc.; and a promoter derived from a highly-expressed gene to direct transcription of the coding sequence. Such promoters can be derived from operons encoding glycolytic enzymes such as 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK), α-factor, acid phosphatase, or heat shock proteins, among others.

In many embodiments, a parent host cell comprises a mevalonate pathway enzyme-encoding nucleotide sequence operably linked to an inducible promoter. Similarly, in many embodiments, a genetically modified host cell will comprise an HMGR and/or an HMGS encoding nucleotide sequence operably linked to an inducible promoter. Inducible promoters are well known in the art. Suitable inducible promoters include, but are not limited to, the pL of bacteriophage λ; Plac; Ptrp; Ptac (Ptrp-lac hybrid promoter); an isopropyl-beta-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG)-inducible promoter, e.g., a lacZ promoter; a tetracycline-inducible promoter; an arabinose inducible promoter, e.g., P_(BAD) (see, e.g., Guzman et al. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177:4121-4130); a xylose-inducible promoter, e.g., Pxyl (see, e.g., Kim et at. (1996) Gene 181:71-76); a GAL1 promoter; a tryptophan promoter; a lac promoter; an alcohol-inducible promoter, e.g., a methanol-inducible promoter, an ethanol-inducible promoter; a raffinose-inducible promoter; a heat-inducible promoter, e.g., heat inducible lambda P_(L) promoter, a promoter controlled by a heat-sensitive repressor (e.g., C1857-repressed lambda-based expression vectors; see, e.g., Hoffmann et al. (1999) FEMS Microbiol Lett. 177(2):327-34); and the like.

In many embodiments, a parent host cell is generated by genetically modifying a host cell with a nucleic acid that includes a nucleotide sequence encoding a mevalonate pathway gene product, where the nucleotide sequence encoding a mevalonate pathway gene product is operably linked to a constitutive promoter. Similarly, in some embodiments, an HMGS and/or an HMGR coding sequence is operably linked to a constitutive promoter. Suitable constitutive promoters for use in prokaryotic cells are known in the art and include, but are not limited to, a sigma70 promoter, e.g., a consensus sigma70 promoter.

In yeast, a number of vectors containing constitutive or inducible promoters may be used. For a review see, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Vol. 2, 1988, Ed. Ausubel, et al., Greene Publish. Assoc. & Wiley Interscience, Ch. 13; Grant, et al., 1987, Expression and Secretion Vectors for Yeast, in Methods in Enzymology, Eds. Wu & Grossman, 31987, Acad. Press, N.Y., Vol. 153, pp. 516-544; Clover, 1986, DNA Cloning, Vol. II, IRL Press, Wash., D.C., Ch. 3; and Bitter, 1987, Heterologous Gene Expression in Yeast, Methods in Enzymology, Eds. Berger & Kimmel, Acad. Press, N.Y., Vol. 152, pp. 673-684; and The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, 1982, Eds. Strathem et al., Cold Spring Harbor Press, Vols. I and II. A constitutive yeast promoter such as ADH or LEU2 or an inducible promoter such as GAL may be used (Cloning in Yeast, Ch. 3, R. Rothstein In: DNA Cloning Vol. 11, A Practical Approach, Ed. D M Glover, 1986, IRL Press, Wash., D.C.). Alternatively, vectors may be used which promote integration of foreign DNA sequences into the yeast chromosome.

Where a parent host cell has been genetically modified to produce two or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, nucleotide sequences encoding the two or more enzymes will in some embodiments each be contained on separate expression vectors. Where the host cell is genetically modified to express one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, nucleotide sequences encoding the one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes will in some embodiments be contained in a single expression vector. Where nucleotide sequences encoding the one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes are contained in a single expression vector, in some embodiments, the nucleotide sequences will be operably linked to a common control element (e.g., a promoter), e.g., the common control element controls expression of all of the mevalonate pathway enzyme-encoding nucleotide sequences on the single expression vector.

Where nucleotide sequences encoding the mevalonate pathway enzyme(s) are contained in a single expression vector, in some embodiments, the nucleotide sequences will be operably linked to different control elements (e.g., a promoters), e.g., the different control elements control expression of each of the mevalonate pathway enzyme-encoding nucleotide sequences separately on a single expression vector.

Where a parent host cell is genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding enzyme(s) that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, in some embodiments the enzymes will be encoded on two different (separate) expression constructs. For example, in some embodiments, HMGR will be expressed from a high-copy plasmid plasmid, while HMGS will be expressed from a low-copy plasmid, under the control of an identical promoter. In other embodiments, HMGR and HMGS will be expressed from similar copy-number plasmids, with HMGR being expressed by a stronger promoter than HOGS. Where a parent host cell is genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding enzyme(s) that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, in some embodiments the enzymes will be encoded on a single expression construct. For example, in some embodiments, HMGR and HMGS will be expressed from a single plasmid under the control of a single promoter such that the engineered transcript stability of HMGR will be greater than that of HMGS.

Where nucleotide sequences encoding the enzyme(s) that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity are contained in a single expression construct, in some embodiments, the nucleotide sequences will be operably linked to different control elements (e.g., promoters), e.g. the different control elements control expression of each of the enzyme(s) that provide for relief of HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity separately on a single expression construct. For example, in some embodiments, HMGR and HMGS will be expressed from a single plasmid, with HMGR being expressed by a stronger promoter than HMGS.

Nucleotide Sequences Encoding Mevalonate Pathway Enzymes

Nucleotide sequences encoding MEV pathway gene products are known in the art, and any known MEV pathway gene product-encoding nucleotide sequence can used to generate a subject genetically modified host cell. For example, nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, HMGR, MK, PMK, MPD, and IDI are known in the art. The following are non-limiting examples of known nucleotide sequences encoding MEV pathway gene products, with GenBank Accession numbers and organism following each MEV pathway enzyme, in parentheses: acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase: (NC_(—)000913 REGION. 2324131 . . . 2325315; E. coli), (D49362; Paracoccus denitrificans), and (L20428; Saccharomyces cerevisiae); HMGS: (NC_(—)001145. complement 19061 . . . 20536; Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (X96617; Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (X83882; Arabidopsis thaliana), (AB037907; Kitasatospora griseola), and (BT007302; Homo sapiens); HMGR: (NM_(—)206548; Drosophila melanogaster), (NM_(—)204485; Gallus gallus), (AB015627; Streptomyces sp, KO-3988), (AF542543; Nicotiana attenuata), (AB037907; Kitasatospora griseola), (AX128213, providing the sequence encoding a truncated HMGR; Saccharomyces cerevisiae), and (NC_(—)001145: complement (115734 . . . 118898; Saccharomyces cerevisiae)); MK: (L77688; Arabidopsis thaliana), and (X55875; Saccharomyces cerevisiae); PMK: (AF429385; Hevea brasiliensis), (NM_(—)006556; Homo sapiens), (NC_(—)001145. complement 712315 . . . 713670; Saccharomyces cerevisiae); MPD: (X97557; Saccharomyces cerevisiae), (AF290095; Enterococcus faeciuni), and (U49260; Homo sapiens); and IDI: (NC_(—)000913, 3031087 . . . 3031635; E. coli), and (AF082326; Haematococcus pluvialis).

In some embodiments, the HMGR coding region is set forth in SEQ ID NO:13, which encodes a truncated form of HMGR (“tHMGR”) that lacks the transmembrane domain of wild-type HMGR. The transmembrane domain of HMGR contains the regulatory portions of the enzyme and has no catalytic activity.

The coding sequence of any known MEV pathway enzyme may be altered in various ways known in the art to generate targeted changes in the amino acid sequence of the encoded enzyme. The amino acid of a variant MEV pathway enzyme will usually be substantially similar to the amino acid sequence of any known MEV pathway enzyme, i.e. will differ by at least one amino acid, and may differ by at least two, at least 5, at least 10, or at least 20 amino acids, but typically not more than about fifty amino acids. The sequence changes may be substitutions, insertions or deletions. For example, as described below, the nucleotide sequence can be altered for the codon bias of a particular host cell. In addition, one or more nucleotide sequence differences can be introduced that result in conservative amino acid chances in the encoded protein. In one embodiment, the desired relative levels of HMGS and HMGR and the non-toxic levels of HMG-CoA are achieved by expressing an altered HMGS or HMGR protein, or both.

Prenyl Transferases

In some embodiments, a subject genetically modified host cell is genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence(s) encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, as described above; and a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes a prenyl transferase.

Prenyltransferases constitute a broad group of enzymes catalyzing the consecutive condensation of IPP resulting in the formation of prenyl diphosphates of various chain lengths. Suitable prenyltransferases include enzymes that catalyze the condensation of IPP with allylic primer substrates to form isoprenoid compounds with from about 2 isoprene units to about 6000 isoprene units or more, e.g., 2 isoprene units (Geranyl Pyrophosphate synthase), 3 isoprene units (Farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase), 4 isoprene units (geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase), 5 isoprene units, 6 isoprene units (hexadecylpyrophosphate synthase), 7 isoprene units, 8 isoprene units (phytoene synthase, octaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase), 9 isoprene units (nonaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase, 10 isoprene units (decaprenyl pyrophosphate synthase), from about 10 isoprene units to about 15 isoprene units, from about 15 isoprene units to about 20 isoprene units, from about 20 isoprene units to about 25 isoprene units, from about 25 isoprene units to about 30 isoprene units, from about 30 isoprene units to about 40 isoprene units, from about 40 isoprene units to about 50 isoprene units, from about 50 isoprene units to about 100 isoprene units, from about 100 isoprene units to about 250 isoprene units, from about 250 isoprene units to about 500 isoprene units, from about 500 isoprene units to about 1000 isoprene units. from about 1000 isoprene units to about 2000 isoprene units, from about 2000 isoprene units to about 3000 isoprene units, from about 3000 isoprene units to about 4000 isoprene units, from about 4000 isoprene units to about 5000 isoprene units, or from about 5000 isoprene units to about 6000 isoprene units or more.

Suitable prenyltransferases include, but are not limited to, an E-isoprenyl diphosphate synthase, including, but not limited to, geranyl diphosphate (GPP) synthase, farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) synthase, geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP) synthase, hexaprenyl diphosphate (HexPP) synthase, heptaprenyl diphosphate (HepPP) synthase, octaprenyl (OPP) diphosphate synthase, solanesyl diphosphate (SPP) synthase, decaprenyl diphosphate (DPP) synthase, chicle synthase, and gutta-percha synthase; and a Z-isoprenyl diphosphate synthase, including, but not limited to, nonaprenyl diphosphate (NPP) synthase, undecaprenyl diphosphate (UPP) synthase, dehydrodolichyl diphosphate synthase, cicosaprenyl diphosphate synthase, natural rubber synthase, and other Z-isoprenyl diphosphate synthases.

The nucleotide sequences of a numerous prenyl transferases from a variety of species are known, and can be used or modified for use in generating a subject genetically modified host cell. Nucleotide sequences encoding prenyl transferases are known in the art. See, e.g., Human farnesyl pyrophosphate synthetase mRNA (GenBank Accession No. J05262; Homo sapiens); farnesyl diphosphate synthetase (FPP) gene (GenBank Accession No. J05091; Saccharomyces cerevisiae); isopentenyl diphosphate dimethylallyl diphosphate isomerase gene (J05090; Saccharomyces cerevisiae); Wang and Ohnuma (2000) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1529:33-48; U.S. Pat. No. 6,645,747; Arabidopsis thaliana farnesyl pyrophosphate synthetase 2 (FPS2)/FPP synthetase 2/farnesyl diphosphate synthase 2 (At4g17190) mRNA (GenBank Accession No. NM_(—)202836); Ginkgo biloba geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (ggpps) mRNA (GenBank Accession No. AY371321); Arabidopsis thaliana geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate synthase (GCPS1)/GGPP synthetase/farnesyltranstransferase (At4g36810) mRNA (GenBank Accession No. NM_(—)119845); Synechococcus elongatus gene for farnesyl, geranylgeranyl, geranylfarnesyl, hexaprenyl, heptaprenyl diphosphate synthase (SelF-HepPS) (GenBank Accession No. AB016095); etc.

Codon Usage

In some embodiments, the nucleotide sequence encoding a mevalonate pathway enzyme is modified such that the nucleotide sequence reflects the codon preference for the particular host cell. For example, the nucleotide sequence will in some embodiments be modified for yeast codon preference. See, e.g., Bennetzen and Hall (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257(6): 3026-3031. As another non-limiting example, the nucleotide sequence will in other embodiments be modified for E. coli codon preference. See, e.g., Gouy and Gautier (1982) Nucleic Acids Res. 10(22):7055-7074; Eyre-Walker (1996) Mol. Biol. Evol. 13(6):864-872. See also Nakamura et al. (2000) Nucleic Acids Res. 28(1):292.

As noted above, in some embodiments, the codon usage of an HMGS coding sequence is modified such that the level of translation of the HMGS mRNA is decreased. Reducing the level of translation of HMGS mRNA by modifying codon usage is achieved by modifying the sequence to include codons that are rare or not commonly used by the host cell. Codon usage tables for many organisms are available that summarize the percentage of time a specific organism uses a specific codon to encode for an amino acid. Certain codons are used more often than other, “rare” codons. The use of “rare” codons in a sequence generally decreases its rate of translation. Thus, e.g., the coding sequence is modified by introducing one or more rare codons, which affect the rate of translation, but not the amino acid sequence of the enzyme translated, For example, there are 6 codons that encode for arginine: CGT, CGC, CGA, CGG, AGA, and AGG. In E. coli the codons CGT and CGC are used far more often (encoding approximately 40% of the arginines in E. coli each) than the codon AGG (encoding approximately 2% of the arginines in E. coli). Modifying a CGT codon within the sequence of a gene to an AGG codon would not change the sequence of the enzyme, but would likely decrease the gene's rate of translation.

Additional Genetic Modifications

In some embodiments, a subject genetically modified host cell is one that is genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence(s) that encode enzymes that relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity; and that is further genetically modified to achieve enhanced production of a terpene biosynthetic pathway intermediate, and/or that is further genetically modified to enhance production of an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor, and/or that is further genetically modified such that an endogenous terpene biosynthetic pathway gene is functionally disabled. The term “functionally disabled,” as used herein, refers to a genetic modification of a nucleic acid, which modification results in production of a gene product encoded by the nucleic acid that is produced at below normal levels, and/or is non-functional. Such genetic modification(s) may decrease the specific IPP or mevalonate productivity of a strain (production per cell) as compared to a parent strain, but the relief in HMG-CoA induced toxicity would increase the cell density such that the total productivity of the culture (specific productivity multiplied by the cell density of the culture) would increase.

Genetic modifications that enhance production of an endogenous terpene biosynthetic pathway intermediate include, but are not limited to, genetic modifications that result in a reduced level and/or activity of a phosphotransacetylase in the host cell. The intracellular concentration of an isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway intermediate is enhanced by increasing the intracellular concentration of acetyl-CoA. E. coli secretes a significant fraction of intracellular acetyl-CoA in the form of acetate into the medium. Deleting the gene encoding phosphotransacetylase, pta, the first enzyme responsible for transforming acetyl-CoA into acetate, reduces acetate secretion. Genetic modifications that reduce the level and/or activity of phosphotransacetylase in a prokaryotic host cell are particularly useful where the parent host cell is one that is genetically modified with a nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more MEV pathway gene products.

Since acetyl-CoA is a reactant used by both acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGS in the synthesis of HMG-CoA, and in some host cells, increases in the intracellular pool of acetyl-CoA could lead to increases in the intracellular pool of HMG-CoA, which in turn could lead to a toxicity effect. Therefore, genetic modifications that reduce the total activity of phosphotransacetylase could lead to a reduction in growth rate or final cell density due to the accumulation of HMG-CoA, generating a parent strain that could be modified using the method of the invention. Alternatively, genetic modifications that increase the total activity of phosphotransacetylase could be used to overcome a toxicity effect caused by the accumulation of HMG-CoA.

In some embodiments, a genetic modification that results in a reduced level of phosphotransacetylase in a prokaryotic host cell is a genetic mutation that functionally disables the prokaryotic host cell's endogenous pta gene encoding the phosphotransacetylase. The pta gene can be functionally disabled in any of a variety of ways, including insertion of a mobile genetic element (e.g., a transposon, etc.); deletion of all or part of the gene, such that the gene product is not made, or is truncated and is non-functional in converting acetyl-CoA to acetate; mutation of the gene such that the gene product is not made, or is truncated and is non-functional in converting acetyl-CoA to acetate; deletion or mutation of one or more control elements that control expression of the pta gene such that the gene product is not made; and the like.

In some embodiments, the endogenous pta gene of a genetically modified host cell is deleted. Any method for deleting a gene can be used. One non-limiting example of a method for deleting a pta gene is by use of the λRed recombination system. Datsenko and Wanner (2000) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(12): p. 6640-5. The pta gene will in some embodiments be deleted from a host cell (e.g., E. coli) that is genetically modified with a nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding MK, PMK, MPD, and IDI. The pta gene will in some embodiments be deleted from a host cell (e.g., E. coli) that is genetically modified with a nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding MK, PMK, MPD, and IPP. The pta gene will in some embodiments be deleted from a host cell (e.g., E. coli) that is genetically modified with a nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequences encoding MK, PMK, MPD, IPP, and a prenyl transferase.

Other modifications that would increase the levels of intracellular acetyl-CoA include, but are not limited to, modifications that would decrease the total activity of lactate dehydrogenase within the cell, modifications that would decrease the total activity of acetate kinase within the cell, modifications that would decrease the total activity of alcohol dehydrogenase within the cell, modifications that would interrupt the tricarboxylic acid cycle, such as those that would decrease the total activity of 2-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase, or modifications that would interrupt oxidative phosphorylation, such as those that would decrease the total activity of the (F1F0)H+-ATP synthase, or combinations thereof.

Other modifications that would decrease the levels of intracellular acetyl-CoA include, but are not limited to, modifications that would increase the total activity of lactate dehydrogenase within the cell, modifications that would increase the total activity of acetate kinase within the cell, and modifications that would increase the total activity of alcohol dehydrogenase within the cell, or combinations thereof.

In some embodiments, a parent host cell is one that is genetically modified, as described above to increase levels of HMG-CoA; and is further genetically modified such that an endogenous DXP biosynthetic pathway gene is functionally disabled. Such a genetically modified host cell is useful in screening for enzymes that convert HMG-CoA to mevalonate, as described in more detail below, as the HMG-CoA toxicity would be exacerbated by the reliance of the cell on the mevalonate pathway for the production of required isoprenoids.

In other embodiments, a subject genetically modified host cell is one that is genetically modified to include one or more nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence(s) that encode DXP biosynthetic pathway gene product(s); and that is further genetically modified such that an endogenous MEV biosynthetic pathway gene is functionally disabled. Such a host cell would be useful in the instance where for technical reasons screening of enzymes associated with the HMG-CoA toxicity was most facilely carried out in an organism that naturally utilized the mevalonate pathway for production of isoprenoids.

In some embodiments, where subject genetically modified host cell is a prokaryotic host cell that has been genetically modified with nucleic acid(s) comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more MEV pathway gene products, the host cell will be further genetically modified such that one or more endogenous DXP pathway genes is functionally disabled. DXP pathway genes that can be functionally disabled include one or more of the genes encoding any of the following DXP gene products: 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate synthase, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate reductoisomerase, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol synthase, 4-diphosphocytidyl-2-C-methyl-D-erythritol kinase, 2C-methyl-D-erythritol 2,4-cyclodiphosphate synthase, and 1-hydroxy-2-methyl-2-(E)-butenyl 4-diphosphate synthase.

An endogenous DXP pathway gene can be functionally disabled in any of a variety of ways, including insertion of a mobile genetic element (e.g., a transposon, etc.); deletion of all or part of the gene, such that the gene product is not made, or is truncated and is enzymatically inactive; mutation of the gene such that the gene product is not made, or is truncated and is enzymatically non-functional; deletion or mutation of one or more control elements that control expression of the gene such that the gene product is not made; and the like.

Compositions Comprising a Subject Genetically Modified Host Cell

The present invention further provides compositions comprising a subject genetically modified host cell. A subject composition comprises a subject genetically modified host cell; and will in some embodiments comprise one or more further components, which components are selected based in part on the intended use of the genetically modified host cell. Suitable components include, but are not limited to, salts; buffers; stabilizers; protease-inhibiting agents; cell membrane- and/or cell wall-preserving compounds, e.g., glycerol, dimethylsulfoxide, etc.; nutritional media appropriate to the cell; and the like.

Nucleic Acids

The present invention provides nucleic acid(s) comprising nucleotide sequences encoding HMGS and/or HMGR, wherein the nucleic acid(s), when introduced into a parent host cell that includes or is genetically modified to include, relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity or growth inhibition. Thus, a subject nucleic acid, when introduced into a host cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, relieves the HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity or growth inhibition. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR operably linked to a strong promoter.

In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid is an expression construct that comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR. In some embodiments, the expression construct is one that provides for synthesis of the encoded HMGR in a prokaryotic cell. In some embodiments, the expression construct is one that provides for synthesis of the encoded HMGR in a eukaryotic cell. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR, where the nucleic acid is a medium copy number plasmid. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR, where the nucleic acid is a high copy number plasmid. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR operably linked to a strong promoter, where the nucleic acid is a high copy number plasmid. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR operably linked to a strong promoter, where the nucleic acid is a medium copy number plasmid. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR operably linked to a weak promoter on a medium copy plasmid.

In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a fusion protein comprising acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase operably linked to HMGR. In some embodiments, a nucleic acid encoding the acetoacetyl-CoA/HMG-R fusion protein is generated by linking the coding sequences of acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGR. In some embodiments, the fusion protein is one that is found in nature. In other embodiments, the fusion protein is one that is found in nature, and is other than the fusion protein discussed in Hedl et al. ((2002) J. Bacteriol. 184:2116-2122). In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a fusion protein comprising acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase and HMGS. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a fusion protein comprising acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR. In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a fusion protein comprising HMGS and HMGR.

In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid is an expression construct that comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGR, where the expression construct is other than an expression construct disclosed in any of the following references: Kato-Emori et al. Mol Genet Genomics (2001) 265:135-42, Learned P M, et al. PANS. (1989) 86:2779-83, T. Dairi, et al. Mol Gen Genet (2000) 262: 957-964, Allen, et al. Appl Environ. Microbio. (1997). 63:3341-3344, Hedl, et al. J. Bacteriol., (2002), 184:2116-2122, Jackson, et al. Org. Lett. (2003) 5:1629-1632, Randolph Y. Hampton, et al. (11994) Cell, 125:299-312, Markus Veen, et al. FEMS Yeast Res (2003) 4:87-95, Beach M J, et al. J Bacteriol (1989) 171:2994-3001, Bischoff K M, et al. Protein Sci (1997) 6:156-161, Friesen J A, et al. Biochemistry. (1997) 362173-7, Frimpong, et al. J Biol. Chem. (1994) 269:11478-83, Panda, et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol (2004) 66: 1431-152.

Screening Methods

The present invention provides screening methods for identifying a gene product having HMG-CoA detoxification activity; and methods for identifying an agent that inhibits accumulation of HMG-CoA. In one embodiment the gene produce identified is one that encodes an HMGR, e.g., a variant HMGR. In one embodiment the gene product identified is one that encodes a variant HMGR, where the variant HMGR provides for an increase in the total HMGR activity in the cell. In another embodiment, the gene product identified produces a product that decreases HMGS activity. In another embodiment the gene product identified produces a product that utilizes mevalonate as a substrate. In another embodiment, the gene identified produces a product that encodes a MK. In another example, the gene product identified provides for transport of mevalonate from the cell. In another embodiment. the gene product identified is an HMG-CoA lyase or encodes an HMG-CoA lyase. In another embodiment the gene product identified encodes a succinate-hydroxymethylglutarate CoA-transferase, or is a succinate-hydroxymethylglutarate CoA-transferase.

For identifying a gene product that reduces HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, the methods generally involve producing a test cell by introducing into a host cell an exogenous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a candidate gene product, where the host cell produces HMG-CoA at levels effective to inhibit growth of the host cell; and b) determining the effect, if any, of expression of the candidate gene product on the growth of the test cell. For identifying an agent that reduces accumulation of intracellular HMG-CoA, and/or that reduces the level of HMGS activity in a cell, the methods generally involve a) contacting a test cell with a test agent, where the test cell synthesizes mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, and where the test cell exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition; and b) determining the effect, if any, of the test agent on HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. As used herein, the term “determining” refers to both quantitative and qualitative determinations and as such, the term “determining” is used interchangeably herein with “assaying,” “measuring,” and the like.

The subject screening methods are in vitro cell-based assays. Any of a variety of cells can be used. The cells used in the assay are in some embodiments eukaryotic cells, as described above. In other embodiments, the cells used in the assay are prokaryotic cells, as described above.

Methods of Identifying a Gene Product Having, HMG-CoA Detoxification Activity

The present invention provides in vitro screening methods for identifying a gene product having HMG-CoA detoxification activity. The gene products so identified are useful for relieving HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity, and are therefore useful in methods of producing isoprenoid compounds or isoprenoid precursors. The methods generally involve a) producing a test cell by introducing into a host cell an exogenous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a candidate gene product, where the host cell produces HMG-CoA at levels effective to inhibit growth of the host cell; and b) determining the effect, if any, of expression of the candidate gene product on the growth of the test cell, compared to the host cell. The ability of the candidate gene product to reduce HMG-CoA accumulation and relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity is determined by the ability of the candidate gene product to reduce HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. A reduction in growth inhibition in the test cell, compared to the host cell, indicates that the exogenous nucleic acid encodes a gene product having sufficient activity to relieve HMG-CoA accumulation-induced toxicity. The host cell is one that produces one or more enzymes in the mevalonate pathway, such that HMG-CoA is produced. In some embodiments, the host cell is one that does not normally produce mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, and has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding one or more mevalonate pathway enzymes, such that HMG-CoA is produced and accumulated intracellularly at growth-inhibiting levels. In other embodiments, the host cell is one that naturally produces HMG-CoA at growth-inhibiting levels or that has been genetically modified, other than via introduction of one or more exogenous MEV pathway genes, to do so.

HMG-CoA is produced in the host cell in an amount that inhibits growth of the host cell: e.g., the intracellular concentration of HMG-CoA inhibits the growth of the host cell. Typically, HMG-CoA accumulates in the host cell in an amount that inhibits growth of the host cell by at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, or at least about 90%, or more, compared to the growth rate of a control host cell that does not produce HMG-CoA, or compared to the growth rate of the host cell that is cultured under conditions that are not conducive to synthesis of growth-inhibiting amounts of HMG-CoA. In some embodiments, HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly in the host cell in an amount that is lethal to the host cell, e.g., induces death of the host cell.

In some embodiments, a host cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition is a cell that does not normally synthesize mevalonate or IPP via a mevalonate pathway, and has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding mevalonate pathway enzyme(s). For example, in some embodiments, a host cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition is a prokaryotic cell that has been genetically modified with one or more nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR, where the acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR are produced in the cell in amounts that result in HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition.

In other embodiments, a host cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition is a cell that normally produces mevalonate or IPP via a mevalonate pathway, and that has been genetically modified such that the levels intracellular HMG-CoA are increased, resulting in HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition.

The test cell is cultured in vitro under conditions such that HMG-CoA accumulates intracellularly in an amount that is growth inhibiting and/or death inducing. In some embodiments, the test cell is cultured in the presence of an inducer that induces expression of a nucleotide sequence encoding HMGS or HMGR, where the nucleotide sequence is under control of an inducible promoter. Whether the HMG-CoA is present in the test cell in an amount that inhibits growth of the test cell can be determined using any standard method for detecting growth inhibition of a cell. For example, growth is frequently measured as an increase in optical density when cells are grown in liquid culture; and growth inhibition can be detected by comparing the optical density (e.g., at 600 nm) of a liquid culture of host cells that produce a growth-inhibiting amount of HMG-CoA, with. the optical density of a liquid culture of the same host cells that do produce a growth-inhibiting amount of the intermediate. Growth inhibition can also be detected by visually inspecting the colony size of cells plated on agar containing suitable growth media.

A subject screening method involves introducing an exogenous nucleic acid into a host cell, producing a test cell, where the host cell is one that exhibits growth inhibition when HMG-CoA is produced in a growth-inhibiting amount. When an exogenous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes HMGR is introduced into the host cell, growth inhibition of the test cell is relieved. Thus, a reduction in growth inhibition indicates that the exogenous nucleic acid encodes HMGR, where the encoded HMGR is produced at a level and/or has an activity that relieves the HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. A reduction in growth inhibition includes an at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or more, reduction in growth inhibition. In some embodiments, the HMGR encoded by the exogenous nucleic acid reduces the growth inhibition such that the rate of cell growth is restored to the rate of cell growth of the host cell when grown under conditions such that HMG-CoA is not produced in growth inhibiting amounts.

In some embodiments, e.g., where the exogenous nucleic acid is a plurality of exogenous nucleic acids (e.g., a cDNA library, a genomic library, a population of nucleic acids, each encoding an HMGR with a different amino acid sequence, etc.), the exogenous nucleic acid are introduced into a plurality of host cells, forming a plurality of test cells. The test cells are in some embodiments grown in liquid culture under conditions such that HMG-CoA is accumulated intracellularly in a growth inhibiting and/or death-inducing amount; those test cells comprising an exogenous nucleic acid that comprises nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR will grow faster than test cells that do not comprise an exogenous nucleic acid that comprises nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR, or those test cells comprising an exogenous nucleic acid that comprises nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR will live, while test cells that do not comprise an exogenous nucleic acid that comprises nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR will die.

In some embodiments, the method further involves isolating an exogenous nucleic acid from a test cell, where the exogenous nucleic acid is one that that relieves growth inhibition in a subject screening method. Methods of isolating the exogenous nucleic acid from a test cell are well known in the art. Suitable methods include, but are not limited to, any of a number of alkaline lysis methods that are standard in the art.

In some embodiments, a subject screening method will further comprise further characterizing a candidate gene product. In these embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid comprising nucleotide sequence(s) encoding HMGR are isolated from a test cell; the gene product(s) are expressed in a cell and/or in an in vitro cell-free transcription/translation system. In some embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid is subjected to nucleotide sequence analysis, and the amino acid sequence of the gene product deduced from the nucleotide sequence. In some embodiments, the amino acid sequence of the gene product is compared with other amino acid sequences in a public database of amino acid sequences, to determine whether any significant amino acid sequence identity to an amino acid sequence of a known protein exists. In addition, the gene product(s) are expressed in a cell and/or in an in vitro cell-free transcription/translation system; and the effect of the gene product(s) on a metabolic pathway intermediate or other metabolite is analyzed.

Exogenous nucleic acids that are suitable for introducing into a host cell, to produce a test cell, include, but are not limited to, naturally-occurring nucleic acids isolated from a cell; naturally-occurring nucleic acids that have been modified (e.g., by mutation) before or subsequent to isolation from a cell; synthetic nucleic acids, e.g., nucleic acids synthesized in a laboratory using standard methods of chemical synthesis of nucleic acids, or generated by recombinant methods; synthetic or naturally-occurring nucleic acids that have been amplified in vitro, either within a cell or in a cell-free system; and the like.

Exogenous nucleic acids that are suitable for introducing into a host cell include, but are not limited to, genomic DNA; RNA; a complementary DNA (cDNA) copy of mRNA isolated from a cell; recombinant DNA; and DNA synthesized in vitro, e.g., using standard cell-free in vitro methods for DNA synthesis. In some embodiments, exogenous nucleic acids are a cDNA library made from cells, either prokaryotic cells or eukaryotic cells. In some embodiments, exogenous nucleic acids are a genomic DNA library made from cells, either prokaryotic cells or eukaryotic cells.

Nucleic acids will in some embodiments be mutated before being introduced into a host cell. Methods of mutating a nucleic acid are well know in the art and include well-established chemical mutation methods, radiation-induced mutagenesis, and methods of mutating a nucleic acid during synthesis. Chemical methods of mutating DNA include exposure of DNA to a chemical mutagen, e.g., ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), N-nitrosourea (END), N-methyl-N-nitro-N′-nitrosoguanidine, 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide, diethylsulfate, benzopyrene, cyclophosphamide, bleomycin, triethylmelamine, acrylamide monomer, nitrogen mustard, vincristine, diepoxyalkanes (e.g., diepoxybutane), ICR-170, formaldehyde, procarbazine hydrochloride, ethylene oxide, dimethylhitrosamine, 7,12 dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, chloramnbucil, hexamethylphospboramide, bisulfan, and the like. Radiation mutation-inducing agents include ultraviolet radiation, γ-irradiation, X-rays, and fast neutron bombardment. Mutations can also be introduced into a nucleic acid using, e.g., trimethylpsoralen with ultraviolet light. Random or targeted insertion of a mobile DNA element, e.g., a transposable element, is another suitable methods for generating mutations. Mutations can be introduced into a nucleic acid during amplification in a cell-free in vitro system, e.g., using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique such as error-prone PCR. Mutations can be introduced into a nucleic acid in vitro using DNA shuffling techniques (e.g., exon shuffling, domain swapping, and the like). Mutations can also be introduced into a nucleic acid as a result of a deficiency in a DNA repair enzyme in a cell, e.g., the presence in a cell of a mutant gene encoding a mutant DNA repair enzyme is expected to generate a high frequency of mutations (i.e., about 1 mutation/100 genes-1 mutation/10,000 genes) in the genome of the cell. Examples of genes encoding DNA repair enzymes include but are not limited to Mut H, Mut S, Mut L, and Mut U, and the homologs thereof in other species (e.g., MSH 1-6, PMS 1-2, MLH 1, GTBP, ERCC-1, and the like). Methods of mutating nucleic acids are well known in the art, and any known method is suitable for use. See, e.g., Stemple (2004) Nature 5:1-6; Chiang et al. (1993) PCR Methods Appl 2(3): 210-217; Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:10747-51; and U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,033,861, and 6,773,900.

In many embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid is inserted into an expression vector. Expression vectors that are suitable for use in prokaryotic and eukaryotic host cells are known in the art. and any suitable expression vector can be used. Suitable expression vectors are as described above.

As noted above, an exogenous nucleic acid will in some embodiments be isolated from a cell or an organism in its natural environment. In some embodiments, the nucleic acid of the cell or organism will be mutated before nucleic acid is isolated from the cell or organism. In other embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid is synthesized in a cell-free system in vitro.

Exogenous nucleic acids that are suitable for introducing into a host cell include nucleic acids isolated from cells or organism of a different species from the host cell. Suitable sources of exogenous nucleic acids include, but are not limited to, a cell or organism of any of the six kingdoms, e.g., Bacteria (e.g., Eubacteria); Archaebacteria; Protista; Fungi; Plantae; and Animalia. Suitable sources of exogenous nucleic acids include plant-like members of the kingdom Protista, including, but not limited to, algae (e.g., green algae, red algae, glaucophytes, cyanobacteria); fangus-like members of Protista, e.g., slime molds, water molds, etc.; animal-like members of Protista, e.g., flagellates (e.g., Euglena), amoeboids (e.g., amoeba), sporozoans (e.g., Apicomplexa, Myxozoa, Microsporidia), and ciliates (e.g., Paramecium). Suitable sources of exogenous nucleic acids include members of the kingdom Fungi, including, but not limited to, members of any of the phyla: Basidiomycota (club fungi; e.g., members of Agaricus, Amanita, Boletus, Cantherellus, etc.); Ascomycota (sac fungi, including, e.g., Saccharomyces); Mycophycophyta (lichens); Zygomycota (conjugation fungi); and Deuteromycota. Suitable sources of exogenous nucleic acids include members of the kingdom Plantae, including, but not limited to, members of any of the following divisions: Bryophyta (e.g., mosses), Anthocerotophyta (e.g., hornworts), Hepaticophyta (e.g., liverworts), Lycophhyta (e.g., club mosses), Sphenophyta (e.g., horsetails), Psilophyta (e.g., whisk ferns), Ophioglossophyta, Pterophyta (e.g., ferns), Cycadophyta, Gingkophyta, Pinophyta, Gnetophyta, and Magnoliophyta (e.g., flowering plants). Suitable sources of exogenous nucleic acids include members of the kingdom Animalia, including, but not limited to, members of any of the following phyla: Porifera (sponges); Placozoa; Orthonectida (parasites of marine invertebrates); Rhombozoa; Cnidaria (corals, anemones, jellyfish, sea pens, sea pansies, sea wasps); Cteniophora (comb jellies); Platyhelmintlies (flatworms); Nemeitina (ribbon worms); Ngathostomulida (jawed worms)p Gastrotricha; Rotifera; Priapulida; Kinorhyncha; Loricifera; Acanthocephala; Entoprocta; Nemotoda; Nematomorpha; Cycliophora; Mollusca (mollusks); Sipuncula (peanut worms); Annelida (segmented worms); Tardigrada (water bears); Onychophora (velvet worms); Arthropoda (including the subphyla: Chelicerata, Myriapoda, Hexapoda, and Crustacea, where the Chelicerata include, e.g., arachnids, Merostomata, and Pycnogonida, where the Myriapoda include, e.g., Chilopoda (centipedes), Diplopoda (millipedes), Paropoda, and Symphyla, where the Hexapoda include insects, and where the Crustacea include shrimp, krill, barnacles, etc.; Phoronuda; Ectoprocta (moss animals); Brachiopoda; Echinodermata (e.g. starfish, sea daisies, feather stars, sea urchins, sea cucumbers, brittle stars, brittle baskets, etc.); Chaetognatha (arrow worms); Hemichordata (acorn worms); and Chordata. Suitable members of Chordata include any member of the following subphyla: Urochordata (sea squirts; including Ascidiacea, Thaliacea, and Larvacea); Cephalochordata (lancelets); Myxini (hagfish); and Vertebrata, where members of Vertebrata include, e.g., members of Petromyzontida (lampreys), Chondriclithyces (cartilaginous fish), Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish), Actinista (coelocanths), Dipnoi (lungfish), Reptilia (reptiles, e.g., snakes, alligators, crocodiles, lizards, etc.), Aves (birds); and Mammalian (mammals). Suitable plants include any monocotyledon and any dicotyledon.

Thus, e.g., suitable cells include cells from organisms that include, but are not limited to, a protozoan, a plant, a fungus, an algal cell, a yeast, a reptile, an amphibian, a mammal, a marine microorganism, a marine invertebrate, an arthropod, an isopod, an insect, an arachnid, an archaebacterium, and a eubacterium.

In some embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid will be isolated from a tissue taken from an organism; from a particular cell or group of cells isolated from an organism; etc. For example, where the organism is a plant, the exogenous nucleic acid will in some embodiments be isolated from the xylem, the phloem, the cambium layer, leaves, roots, etc. Where the organism is an animal, the exogenous nucleic acid will in some embodiments be isolated from a particular tissue (e.g., lung, liver, heart, kidney, brain, spleen, skin, fetal tissue, etc.), or a particular cell type (e.g., neuronal cells, T epithelial cells, endothelial cells, astrocytes, macrophages, glial cells, islet cells, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, etc.).

In some embodiments, the exogenous nucleic acid is a synthetic nucleic acid. In some embodiments, a synthetic nucleic acid comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a variant HMGR, e.g., a HMGR that differs in amino acid sequence by one or more amino acids from a naturally-occurring HMGR or other parent HMGR. In some embodiments, a variant HMGR differs in amino acid sequence by one amino acid, two amino acids, three amino acids, four amino acids, five amino acids, six amino acids, seven amino acids, eight amino acids, nine amino acids, or amino acids, or more, compared to the amino acid sequence of a naturally-occurring parent HMGR. In some embodiments, a variant HMGR differs in amino acid sequence by from about 10 amino acids to about 15 amino acids, from about 15 amino acids to about 20 amino acids, from about 20 amino acids to about 25 amino acids, from about 25 amino acids to about 30 amino acids, from about 30 amino acids to about 35 amino acids, from about 35 amino acids to about 40 amino acids, from about 40 amino acids to about 50 amino acids, or from about 50 amino acids to about 60 amino acids, or more, compared to the amino acid sequence of a naturally-occurring parent HMGR.

In some embodiments, a variant HMGR is encoded by a nucleic acid that hybridizes under stringent hybridization conditions to a nucleic acid encoding a known HMGR. in other embodiments, a variant HMGR is encoded by a nucleic acid that hybridizes under moderate hybridization conditions to a nucleic acid encoding a known HMGR. In other embodiments, a variant HMGR is encoded by a nucleic acid that hybridizes under low stringency hybridization conditions to a nucleic acid encoding a known HMGR.

In some embodiments, a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a naturally-occurring HMGR is mutated, using any of a variety of well-established methods, giving rise to a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a variant HMGR. Suitable mutagenesis methods include, but are not limited to, chemical mutation methods, radiation-induced mutagenesis, and methods of mutating a nucleic acid during synthesis, as described supra. Thus, e.g., a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a naturally-occurring HMGR is exposed to a chemical mutagen, as described above, or subjected to radiation mutation, or subjected to an error-prone PCR, and the mutagenized nucleic acid introduced into a genetically modified host cell(s) as described above. Methods for random mutagenesis using a “mutator”. strain of bacteria are also well sown in the art and can be used to generate a variant HMGR. See, e.g., Greener et al., “An Efficient Random Mutagenesis Technique Using an E. coli Mutator Strain”, Methods in Molecular Biology, 57:375-385 (1995). Saturation mutagenesis techniques employing a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are also well known and can be used. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,171,820. Nucleic acids comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a variant HMGR are identified by the ability to relieve growth inhibition caused by HMG-CoA accumulation.

Nucleotide sequences encoding HMGR are known in the art, and any known HMGR-encoding nucleotide sequence can be altered to generate a synthetic nucleic acid for use in a subject method.

Of particular interest in some embodiments is identification of variant HMGR that exhibit increased enzymatic activity, that that therefore reduce HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition. A variant HMGR that exhibits increased enzymatic activity exhibits at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 30%, at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, at least about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 10-fold, or at least about 25-fold, or more, greater enzymatic activity compared to a parent HMGR.

Methods of Identifying an Agent that Reduces Accumulation of HMG-CoA

The present invention further provides in vitro screening methods for identifying an agent that inhibits or reduces accumulation of HMG-CoA; methods of identifying agents that reduce the level of HAGS activity in a cell; methods of identifying an agent that inhibits production of HMG-CoA; and methods of identifying an agent that converts or accelerates the conversion of HMG-CoA to another compound. The methods generally involve a) contacting a test cell with a test agent, where the test cell synthesizes mevalonate via a mevalonate pathway, and where the test cell exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition; and b) determining the effect, if any, of the test agent on HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition. A reduction in growth inhibition indicates that the agent reduces intracellular accumulation of growth-inhibiting levels of HMG-CoA.

Agents that inhibit or reduce accumulation of HMG-CoA in a cell and promote cell growth are useful for increasing production of an isoprenoid compound, as described herein. Agents that inhibit or reduce accumulation of HMG-CoA in a cell, and that reduce the level of HMGS activity in the cell, are also useful in reducing cholesterol biosynthesis, and thus are useful for treating a variety of disorders associated with high blood cholesterol levels.

The terms “candidate agent,” “test agent,” “agent”, “substance” and “compound” are used interchangeably herein. Candidate agents encompass numerous chemical classes, typically synthetic, semi-synthetic, or naturally occurring inorganic or organic molecules. Candidate agents include those found in large libraries of synthetic or natural compounds. For example, synthetic compound libraries are commercially available from Maybridge Chemical Co. (Trevillet, Cornwall, UK), ComGenex (South San Francisco, Calif.), and MicroSource (New Milford, Conn.). A rare chemical library is available from Aldrich (Milwaukee, Wis.) and can also be used. Alternatively, libraries of natural compounds in the form of bacterial, fungal, plant and animal extracts are available from Pan Labs (Bothell, Wash.) or are readily producible.

Candidate agents may be small organic or inorganic compounds having a molecular weight of more than 50 and less than about 2,500 daltons. Candidate agents may comprise functional groups necessary for structural interaction with proteins, particularly hydrogen bonding, and may include at least an amine, carbonyl, hydroxyl or carboxyl group, and may contain at least two of the functional chemical groups. The candidate agents may comprise cyclical carbon or heterocyclic structures and/or aromatic or polyaromatic structures substituted with one or more of the above functional groups. Candidate agents are also found among biomolecules including peptides, saccharides, fatty acids, steroids, purines, pyrimidines, derivatives, structural analogs or combinations thereof.

Assays of the invention include controls, where suitable controls include a cell that exhibits HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition in the absence of the test agent. Generally a plurality of assay mixtures is uro in parallel with different agent concentrations to obtain a differential response to the various concentrations. Typically, one of these concentrations serves as a negative control, i.e. at zero concentration or below the level of detection.

A suitable period of time for contacting the agent with the cell can be determined empirically, and is generally a time sufficient to allow entry of the agent into the cell and to allow the agent to have a measurable effect on HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition. Generally, a suitable time is between 10 minutes and 24 hours. or from about 1 hour to about 8 hours.

The screening methods may be designed a number of different ways, where a variety of assay configurations and protocols may be employed, as are known in the art. For example, test cells (cells that exhibit HMG-CoA accumulation-induced growth inhibition) can be plated in wells of a multi-well plate (e.g., a 96-well plate, a 384-well plate, etc.) and various test agents added individually to the wells of the plate. The screening method can be automated.

A candidate agent is assessed for any cytotoxic activity it may exhibit toward the cell used in. the assay, using well-known assays, such as trypan blue dye exclusion, an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay, and the like. Agents that do not exhibit cytotoxic activity are considered candidate agents.

A test agent of interest is one that reduces HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition by at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or more, when compared to a control in the absence of the test agent. Whether the test agent has an effect on cell growth inhibition is readily determined using standard methods, as described above.

In some embodiments, the test agent is one that reduces the level of HMGS activity in the cell. A test agent of interest is one that reduces the level of HMGS activity by at least about 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%, at least about 35%, at least about 40%, at least about 45%, at least about 50%, at least about 55%, at least about 60%, at least about 65%, at least about 70%, at least about 80%, at least about 90%, or more, when compared to a control in the absence of the test agent.

Whether a test agent reduces the level of HMGS activity in the cell is readily determined using a variety of assay methods. As one non-limiting example, HMGS enzymatic activity is measured in a cell lysate from cell samples in which a test agent reduces HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition. HMGS can be assayed by adding an excess of acetyl-CoA and acetoacetyl-CoA to a buffered solution (for example, 100 mM Tris-HCl) containing cell extract or purified enzyme. After five minutes, the reaction can be stopped (e.g. by freezing the sample) and the HMG-CoA created can be measured by LC-MS.

As another example, HMGS mRNA levels in a cell are measured. A number of methods are available for analyzing nucleic acids for the presence and/or level of a specific mRNA in a cell. The mRNA may be assayed directly or reverse transcribed into cDNA for analysis. The nucleic acid may be amplified by conventional techniques, such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to provide sufficient amounts for analysis. The use of the polymerase chain reaction is described in Saiki, et al. (1985), Science 239:487; a review of techniques may be found in Sambrook, et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, CSHF Press 1989, pp. 14.2-14.33; and various PCR protocols are described amply in a number of textbooks, including, e.g., PCR Protocols J. Bartlett and D. Stirling, eds. (2003) Humana Press.

A detectable label may be included in an amplification reaction. Suitable labels include fluorochromes, e.g. fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), rhodamine, Texas Red, phycoerythrin, allophycocyanin, 6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM), 2′,7′-dimethoxy-4′,5′-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (JOE), 6-carboxy-X-rhodamine (ROX), 6-carboxy-2′,4′,7′,4,7-hexachlorofluorescein (HEX), 5-carboxyfluorescein (5-FAM) or N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-6-carboxyrhodamine (TAMRA), radioactive labels, e.g. ³²P, ³⁵S, ³H; etc. The label may be a two stage system, where the amplified DNA is conjugated to biotin, haptens, etc. having a high affinity binding partner, e.g. avidin, specific antibodies, etc., where the binding partner is conjugated to a detectable label. The label may be conjugated to one or both of the primers. Alternatively, the pool of nucleotides used in the amplification is labeled, so as to incorporate the label into the amplification product.

A variety of different methods for determining the nucleic acid abundance in a sample are known to those of skill in the art, where particular methods of interest include those described in. Pietu et al., Genome Res. (June 1996) δ: 492-503; Zhao et al., Gene (Apr. 24, 1995) 156-207-213; Soares, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. (October 1997) δ: 542-546; Raval, J. Pharmacol Toxicol Methods (November 1994) 32: 125-127; Chalifour et al. Anal. Biochem (Feb. 1, 1994) 216: 299-304; Stolz & Tuan, Mol. Biotechnol. (December 19960 6: 225-230; Hong et al., Bioscience Reports (1982) 2: 907; and McGraw, Anal. Biochem, (1984) 143: 298. Also of interest are the methods disclosed in WO 97/27317, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.

A number of methods are available for determining the expression level of a protein in a particular sample. For example, detection may utilize staining of cells or histological sections with labeled antibodies specific for the protein, performed in accordance with conventional methods. Cells are permeabilized to stain cytoplasmic molecules. The antibodies of interest are added to the cell sample, and incubated for a period of time sufficient to allow binding to the epitope, usually at least about 10 minutes. The antibody may be labeled with radioisotopes, enzymes, fluorescers, chemiluminescers, or other labels for direct detection. Alternatively, a second stage antibody or reagent is used to amplify the signal. Such reagents are well known in the art. For example, the primary antibody may be conjugated to biotin, with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated avidin added as a second stage reagent. Final detection uses a substrate that undergoes a color change in the presence of the peroxidase. Alternatively, the secondary antibody conjugated to a fluorescent compound, e.g. fluorescein, rhodamine, Texas red, etc. The absence or presence of antibody binding may be determined by various methods, including, flow cytometry of dissociated cells, microscopy, radiography, scintillation counting, etc.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinary skill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how to make and use the present invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of what the inventors regard as their invention nor are they intended to represent that the experiments below are all or the only experiments performed. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers used (e.g. amounts. temperature, etc.) but some experimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, molecular weight is weight average molecular weight, temperature is in degrees Celsius, and pressure is at or near atmospheric. Standard abbreviations may be used, e.g., bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); pl, picoliter(s); s or sec, second(s); min, minute(s); h or hr, hour(s); aa, amino acid(s); kb, kilobase(s); bp, base pair(s); nt, nucleotide(s); i.m., intramuscular(ly); i.p., intraperitoneal(ly); s.c., subcutaneous(ly); and the like.

Example 1 In Vivo Production of Mevalonate Limits the Production of Amorphadiene

The following strains, vectors, growth conditions and analytical methods were used in the following examples.

Strains, Plasmid Construction, and Growth Media Strains

E. coli strains TOP10 and DH10B, both from Invitrogen, were used for cloning and plasmid construction. E. coli DH10B was used for isoprenoid production, growth and metabolite assays.

Growth Media

For cloning and propagation of E. coli strains harboring the various recombinant vectors described herein, Luria broth with Miller's modification (Sigma-Aldrich) was used with appropriate antibiotics for plasmid selection. For production, growth and metabolite assays, engineered (“genetically modified” or “recombinant”) E. coli strains were grown in Luria broth with Miller's modification (LB), 1% (wt/vol) glycerol and appropriate antibiotics. DL-mevalonate used for media supplementation was prepared by mixing 1 volume of 2 M DL-mevalonic acid lactone (Sigma-Aldrich) with 1.02 volumes of 2 M KOH and incubating at 37° C. for 30 minutes (Campos et al. (2001) Biochem. J. 353:59-67). To maintain plasmids, required antibiotics, as appropriate, were added to the growth media. Isopropyl-Beta-D-thiogalactoside (IPTG), from Roche, and L-Arabinose, from Sigma-Aldrich, were used for the induction of promoter systems.

Plasmids/Operons Construction

The heterologous mevalonate pathway multi-gene operons were assembled as described in US Patent Application publication numbers 20030148479 and 20040005678, and Martin et al. (2003) Nat. Biotech. 21(7):796-802. The MevT operon encodes the genes atoB from E. coli, HMGS from S. cerevisiae, and a truncated form of HMGR1 from S. cerevisiae named “tHMGR.” The MevT operon encodes the enzymes responsible for the conversion of acetyl-CoA to mevalonate (FIG. 2). The assembled operon was cloned into pCR4 TOPO vector using the Invitrogen TOPO TA cloning system (Carlsbad, Calif.) for sequencing purposes. Ligation into pCR4 TOPO vector and transformation of Escherichia coli TOP 10 cells were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions.

As expression of biochemical pathways is often optimal at a specific expression level, the MevT operon was cloned in a variety of expression vectors to determine the effect of plasmid copy number and promoter strength on expression of the cloned pathway. The MevT operon was cloned into the SalI site of pBAD24 (Guzman et al. (1995) J. Bacteriology 177:4121-4130), M. Ehrmann et al., (11997) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 13111-13115), medium copy number, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and the MevT operon in pCR4 TOPO with SalI restriction enzyme and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pBAD24MevT (SEQ ID NO:1) (US Patent Application publication numbers 20030148479, 20040005678).

The MevT operon was also cloned into the XmaI-PstI sites of pBAD33 (Guzman et al. (1995) J. Bacteriology 177:4121-4130); Hiszczynska-Sawicka. (1997) PLASMID 38: 174-179), low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and the MevT operon in pCR4 TOPO with XmaI and PstI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid, was named pBAD33MevT (SEQ ID NO:2), see Martin et al. (2003) supra.

To place the MevT operon under the control of a modified P_(LAC) promoter (weaker promoter), the araC-P_(BAD) NsiI-XmaI fragment of pBAD33MevT was replaced with the NsiI-XmaI fragment of pBBR1MCS (Kovach et al. (1995) Gene 166:175-176) containing the modified P_(LAC) promoter. Digestion of both pBAD33MevT and pBBR1MCS was conducted using NsiI and XmaI restriction enzymes and ligated using T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pMevT (SEQ ID NO:3), see US Patent Application publication number 20040005678 and Martin et al. (2003) supra.

To generate the empty plasmid control for pMevT, the MevT operon was excised from pMevT using SalI restriction enzyme. The resulting plasmid containing only the P_(LAC) promoter was called pLac33 (Martin et al. (2003) supra).

To produce FPP, IPP, and DMAPP from mevalonate, the operon called MBIS was constructed as described in US Patent Application publication numbers 20030148479, 20040005678, and Martin et al. (2003) supra. MBIS contains the genes MK, PMK and MPD from S. cerevisiea and idi, and ispA from E. coli (FIG. 2). As described, the MBIS operon was assembled in the plasmid pBBR1MCS-3 (Kovach et al. (1995) supra) under the control of a modified P_(LAC) promoter. The IPTG inducible plasmid was named pMBIS (SEQ ID NO 4).

To produce amorpha-4,11-diene from FPP, a synthetic amorphadine synthase gene was created as described in US Patent Application publication number 20040005678 and Martin et al. (2003) supia. The synthetic gene was cloned into the vector pTrc99A (Amann et al. (1988) Gene 69:301-315), as described, and the IPTG inducible plasmid was named pADS (SEQ ID NO 5).

In order to determine the source of toxicity caused by the increased expression of the MevT operon, the individual genes of the MevT operon and combinations thereof were amplified and cloned into expression vectors.

AtoB was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. AtoB was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pAtoB (SEQ ID NO 6).

HMGS was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. HMGS was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pHMGS (SEQ ID NO 7).

The truncated HMGR was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. The truncated HMGR (tHMGR) was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, and pBAD18 (Guzman et al. (1995) J. Bacteriology 177:4121-4130), medium copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vectors and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting low copy number plasmid was named pHMGR (SEQ ID NO 8) and the resulting medium copy number plasmid was named pBAD18HMGR (SEQ ID NO 9).

An operon containing only HMGS and the truncated HMGR was created by amplifying the two gene segment from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ end of HMGS and the 3′ end of HMGR. The HMGS and HMGR fragment was cloned into the Sail site of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with SalI restriction enzyme and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pHMGSR (SEQ ID NO 10).

The nucleotide sequences of plasmid constructs discussed in the Examples are depicted in FIG. 13A-C to FIG. 24A-C; and various features are highlighted. Coding sequences, terminators, and origins are depicted by bold text, or bold and underlined text. Promoter sequences are in boxes. The “modified pBR322 origin” depicted in FIG. 13A-C and FIG. 21A-C includes a truncated rop gene, and thus provides for a higher copy number plasmid than the (unmodified) pBR322 origin; the plasmid copy number of plasmids containing the modified pBR322 origin is estimated to be from about 30 copies per cell to about 50 copies per cell. See, e.g., Guzman et al. ((1995) J. Bacteriol. 177:4121-4130; and Ehrmann et al. ((1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13111-13115).

Measuring Cell Growth

The cell growth of E. coli cultures were measured by assaying the optical density of the cultures at 600 nm (OD₆₀₀). The OD₆₀₀ of samples taken from cultures in baffled flasks were measured using a UV-Spectrophotometer (Beckman), while the OD₆₀₀ of cultures in microtiter 96-well plates was measured using a microtiter plate reader (SpectraMax, Molecular Devices).

Amorpha-4,11-diene Measurement

Amorpha-4,11-diene concentration was determined by extracting 0.7 mL samples with 0.7 ml of ethyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich) in glass gas chromatography (GC) vials. The samples were then shaken at maximum speed on a Fisher Vortex Genie 2 mixer (Fischer Scientific) for three minutes. The samples were allowed to settle in order to separate the ethyl acetate-water emulsions.

Ethyl acetate culture extracts were analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS). The LEAP technologies auto-injector was programmed to extend the sampling needle into the ethyl acetate layer of the two phase mixture. A 1 μL sample was separated on the GC using a DB-5 column (available from, for example, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.) and helium carrier gas. The oven cycle for each sample was 80° C. for two minutes, increasing temperature at 30° C./minute to a temperature of 160° C., increasing temperature at 3° C./min to 170° C., increasing temperature at 50° C./minute to 300° C., and a hold at 300° C. for two minutes. The resolved samples were analyzed by a Hewlett-Packard model 5973 mass selective detector that monitored ions 189 and 204 m/z. Previous mass spectra demonstrated that the amorpha-4,11-diene synthase product was amorphadiene and that amorphadiene had a retention time of 7.9 minutes using this GC protocol. Because pure standards of amorpha-4,11-diene are not available, the concentrations must be quantified in terms of caryophyllene equivalence. A standard curve for caryophyllene has been determined previously, based on a pure standard from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.). The amorpha-4,11-diene concentration is based on the relative abundance of 189 and 204 m/z ions to the abundance of the total ions in the mass spectra of the two compounds.

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) measurement

Intracellular 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) levels were determined by separating E. coli cells from growth media, halting cellular metabolism and extracting HMG-CoA from cells with Trichloroacetic Acid (TCA), and measuring HMG-CoA concentrations by Liquid Chromatograph/Mass Spectrometer (LC/MS). In order to quickly halt cellular metabolism and separate cells from the culture medium, layered TCA extraction was employed. Prior to sampling the cell culture, a layered TCA and silicone oil sample tube was prepared. In a 15 ml Falcon tube (Fischer Scientific), 500 μl of 10% trichloroacetic acid in deuterium oxide (both Sigma-Adrich) was added to the bottom of the tube followed by a layer of 2 ml of Silicone oil (AR200 by Fluka). Prepared sample tubes were set in ice/water bath to allow the silicone oil layer to become more viscous in order to avoid layer inversion when sampling.

10 ml of cell culture were carefully added to the 15 ml sample tube above the silicone oil layer. The sample tubes were quickly centrifuged at 4° C. at top speed using an Alegra centrifuge for 3 minutes. During this time the centrifugal force moves the cells through the silicone oil layer and into the TCA layer, thereby separating the cells from the culture medium and simultaneously lysing the cells and stopping metabolism.

After spinning down cells, the layer of culture medium was removed by aspiration. Next, the TCA layer was transferred to a 2 ml centrifuge tube and neutralized with 1 ml of 0.5 M Tri-n-octyl-amine in 1,11,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane (both Aldrich). The aqueous layer was removed, filtered and assayed by LC/MS.

The aqueous TCA extract was analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 1100 LC/MS. A 50 μL sample was separated on a C-18 reversed phase HPLC column (Varian) using a two component gradient solvent system. Solvent A was 100 mM Ammonium Acetate buffer at pH 6 and Solvent B was 70% 100 mM Ammonium Acetate buffer and 30% Acetonitrile. The HPLC column was equilibrated each run with 8% Solvent B (92% Solvent A) for 10 minutes. The gradient profile was 8% Solvent B at time 0 minutes to 100% Solvent B at time 15 minutes and isocratic at 100% Solvent B until 28 minutes.

The resolved HMG-CoA samples were analyzed by mass selective detector that monitored ion 912 m/z. Retention time and mass spectrum of extracted HMG-CoA was confirmed using commercial HMG-CoA (Sigma).

Mevalonate (Mevalonic Acid) Measurement

Mevalonate (mevalonic acid) concentration in cultures of engineered E. coli was determined by GC/MS analysis. 560 μL of E. coli culture were mixed with 140 μL of 300 mM/HCl in a glass GC vial to convert mevalonate from acid to lactone form, from mevalonic acid to mevalonic acid lactone. 700 μl of ethyl acetate was added to each vial and then the samples were shaken at maximum speed on a Fisher Vortex Genie 2 mixer (Fischer Scientific) for three minutes.

Ethyl acetate extracts of acidified culture were analyzed on a Hewlett-Packard 6890 gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (GC/MS). The LEAP technologies auto-injector was programmed to extend the sampling needle into ethyl acetate layer of the two phase mixture. A 1 μl sample was separated on the CC using a DB-5 column (available from, for example, Agilent Technologies, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif.) and helium carrier gas. The oven cycle of each sample was modified version of the method of B. H. Woollen et al. (B. H. Woollen et al. J. Chromatogr. B. 760 (2001) 179-184). The oven cycle for each sample was 75° C. for two minutes, increasing temperature at 20° C./minute to a temperature of 150° C., increasing temperature at 15° C./min to 250° C., increasing temperature at 50° C./minute to 300° C. and a hold at 300° C. for two minutes. The resolved samples were analyzed by a Hewlett-Packard model 5973 mass selective detector that monitored ion 71 m/z. Retention time and mass spectrum of extracted mevalonic acid lactone was confirmed using commercial DL-mevalonic acid lactone (Sigma).

Results

Isoprenoid production in E. coli engineered to contain an exogenous mevalonate pathway is often limited by the production of mevalonate. Increases in mevalonate production can lead to increases in the isoprenoid that the host cell is engineered to produce. Relief of HMG-CoA toxicity leading to the increased production of mevalonate therefore leads to increased production of isoprenoid.

To improve isoprenoid production from the mevalonate pathway in E. coli, the limiting steps of the heterologous pathway had to be determined. To do so, plasmids pMevT, pMBIS, and pADS, as described above, were transformed into a single strain of E. coli DH10B by standard methods. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml carbenicillin, 5 μg/ml tetracycline, and 25 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A single colony of the strain was transferred from the LB agar plate to 5 ml of LB liquid medium containing the same antibiotics. This seed culture was incubated by shaking at 37° C. until growth reached a stationary phase.

Inducing the expression of both operons and ADS with IPTG allows the production of amorphadiene from E. coli 's supply of acetyl-CoA. To determine which operon was limiting the production of amorphadiene, E. coli containing all three plasmids was incubated in multiple shake flasks of liquid media consisting of LB media and 1% (wt/vol) glycerol and appropriate antibiotics. Shake flasks were inoculated from the 5 ml seed culture. Cultures were incubated at 37° C. with continuous shaking. Two hours after inoculation, 0.5 mM IPTG was added to each culture to induce expression of the operons. In addition, 10 mM and 20 mM mevalonate was added to different cultures two hours after inoculation. The cultures were incubated at 37° C. with continuous shaking. At multiple time points, the cell growth of the strain and amorphadiene production were assayed.

As shown in FIG. 4, increasing the amount of mevalonate added to the cultures increased the production of amorphadiene from the E. coli strains expressing all three operons. This result demonstrates that the in vivo production of mevalonate by the MevT operon limits the production of the sesquiterpene amorphadiene in these test systems.

FIG. 4. Comparison of amorphadiene production in E. coli strain using the engineered mevlonate pathway [pMevT, pMBIS, pADS] from cultures with varying concentrations of exogenous mevalonate. LB media with 1% Glycerol was supplemented with no mevalonate (0 mM), 10 mM mevalonate or 20 mM mevalonate.

Example 2 Increased Expression of the MevT Operon from Stronger Promoter Systems and Higher Copy Number Plasmid Vectors Results in Growth Inhibition

The following example demonstrates that the increased over-expression of the “top half” (acetoacetyl thiolase, HMGS, and HMGR) of the mevalonate pathway can lead to growth inhibition of the modified host cell.

To increase the in vivo production of mevalonate in E. coli, the MevT operon was transferred to expression systems that would give increased expression of the MevT genes. E. coli DH10B was transformed with the following MevT plasmids, listed in order of increasing expression: pMevT and pTrc99A (where both pMevT and pTrc99A were transformed into the same host cell), pBAD33MevT, and pBAD24MevT. In addition, the corresponding empty control plasmids were transformed into E. coli DH10B: pLac33 and pTrc99A (two plasmids in the same host), pBAD33, and pBAD24. pMevT and pLac33 were co-transformed with pTrc99A to control pMevT and pLac33's modified P_(LAC) promoter with the copy of LacI^(Q) on pTrc99A.

Transformants of strains containing pMevT & pTrc99A, or pLac33 & pTrc99A were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml carbenicillin and 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Transformants of the remaining strains were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A single colony of each strain was transferred from the LB agar plate to 5 ml of LB liquid medium containing the same antibiotics. This seed culture was incubated by shaking at 37° C. until growth reached a stationary phase. The six seed cultures were used to inoculate 96-well titer plates containing LB media plus 1% (wt/vol) glycerol with antibiotics. After 2 hours of continuous shaking at 37° C. in a microtiter plate reader, the strains were induced with either 0.5 mM IPTG (for the induction of pMevT and pLac33) or 2 mM arabinose (for the induction of pBAD33MevT, pBAD24MevT, pBAD33, and pBAD24). After induction, the cultures continued to incubate with continuous shaking at 37° C. Cell growth of each 0.2 mL culture was measured every ten minutes by the micro titer plate reader.

As shown in FIG. 5, induction of MevT from the weak, modified P_(LAC) promoter, contained in pMevT, caused no substantial change in cell growth in comparison to the empty plasmid controls (pLac33/pTrc99A, pBAD33, and pBAD24). However: the increased expression of the MevT operon from araC-P_(BAD) promoter system of pBAD33MevT causes growth inhibition. Retaining the araC-P_(BAD) promoter system but increasing the plasmid copy number, thereby further increasing the total expression of MevT, as occurs in pBAD24MevT, only exacerbates the problem of growth inhibition. As these data demonstrate, increasing the expression of the MevT operon from a medium copy plasmid with a modified P_(LAC) promoter system to a medium copy plasmid with an araC-P_(BAD) promoter system and finally to a high copy plasmid with an araC-P_(BAD) promoter system causes increasing toxicity to the engineered strains.

FIG. 5. Effect of increasing expression of the MevT operon on cell growth of E. coli. Comparison of E. coli harboring empty plasmids pLac33+pTrc99A, pBad33, and pBAD24 with E. coli harboring MevT operons pMevT+pTrc99A, pBAD33MevT, and pBAD24MevT (listed in order of increasing expression).

Example 3 Increased Expression of HMGS Causes Growth Inhibition, but Increased Expression of HMGS and HMGR Together Does Not

The following example shows that the growth inhibition caused by increased expression of the top half of the mevalonate pathway, as discussed in Example 2, is due to the expression of HMGS, which catalyzes the production of HMG-CoA. Expression of HMGR, which catalyzes a reaction in which HMG-CoA is a reactant, along with HMGS, as provided by the methods of the present invention avoids this toxicity.

In order to determine the source of toxicity caused by the increased expression of the MevT operon, the individual genes of the MevT operon and combinations thereof were amplified and cloned into expression vectors. AtoB was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. AtoB was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pAtoB (SEQ ID NO 6). HMGS was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. HMGS was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pHMGS (SEQ ID NO 7). The truncated HMGR was amplified from pBAD24MevT using standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. The truncated HMGR (tEMGR) was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy. arabinose inducible plasmid, and pBAD18 (Guzman et al. (1995) J. Bacteriology 177:4121-4130), medium copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vectors and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting low copy number plasmid was named pHMGR (SEQ ID NO 8), and the resulting medium copy number plasmid was named pBAD18HMGR (SEQ ID NO 9).

An operon containing only HMGS and the truncated HMGR was created by amplifying the two gene segment from pBAD24MevT using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ end of HMGS and the 3′ end of HMGR. The HMGS and HMGR fragment was cloned into the SalI site of pBAD33, low copy, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with SalI restriction enzyme and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pHMGSR (SEQ ID NO 10).

To determine the cause of growth inhibition associated with increased expression of the MevT operon, the operon was broken down into individual components. The plasmids pAtoB, pHMGS, and pHMGR, expressing each of the individual genes, and pHMGSR, expressing the combination of HMGS and HMGR were constructed as described above. These four plasmids, along with pBAD33 (empty plasmid control) and pBAD33MevT were transformed into E. coli DH10B using standard procedures. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A single colony of each strain was transferred from the LB agar plate to 5 ml of LB liquid medium containing the same antibiotic. This seed culture was incubated by shaking at 37° C. until growth reached a stationary phase.

The six seed cultures were used to inoculate 96-well microtiter plates containing 0.2 ml volumes of LB media, 1% (wt/vol) Glycerol, and antibiotics. The 96-well plate cultures were shaken continuously at 37° C. in a micro-titer plate reader and induced with 2 mM arabinose at 2 hours post inoculation. The cell growth of each culture is displayed in FIG. 6.

As shown in FIG. 6, in comparison to the empty plasmid control, the increased expression of atoB and HMGR in E. coli (in strains harboring plasmids pAtoB and pHMGR, respectively), have no significant effect on cell growth. However, the increased expression of HMGS (in strain harboring pHMGS) causes substantial growth inhibition. Interestingly, with the increased co-expression of both HMGS and HMGR (as in strain harboring pHMGSR), cell growth is restored to that of the empty plasmid control. This relief of toxicity is hypothesized to be due to the ability of HMGR to convert the HMG-CoA that is produced by HMGS (and not degraded by any known enzymes in E. coli) into mevalonate. Mevalonate then passed through the cell membrane into the media, as described in (Campos et al. (2001) Biochem. J. 35D:59-67; and Martin et al. (2003) Nature Biotech. 21(7):796-802). However, the increased expression of all three genes in the MevT operon (as in the strain harboring pBAD33MevT), again inhibits cell growth. Because the data show that the increased expression of atoB alone does not cause growth inhibition, toxicity caused by the increased co-expression of atoB with HMGS and HMGR is likely due to the increased production of acetoacetyl-CoA by atoB. Increased production of acetoacetyl-CoA by the increased expression of the E. coli keto thiolase (atoB) provides HMGS with additional substrate and dramatically increases the production of mevalonate (T. Kuzuyama. (2004) Biosci. Biotechnot Biocheni. 68(4): 931-934). However, if the total activity of HMGS is greater than that of HMGR, HMG-CoA will accumulate and likely cause growth inhibition. To verify these hypotheses, the Acyl-CoA pathway intermediates were measured in the engineered strains.

FIG. 6. Comparison of cell growth of E. coli expressing individual MevT genes and combinations thereof at high levels. Cell growth of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33 (empty plasmid control), pAtoB, pHMGR, pHMGS, pHMGSR, and pBAD33MevT.

Example 4 Toxicity Caused by Increased Expression of HMGS is Due to the Increased Enzymatic Activity of the Protein and Not Simply Increased Production of the Protein Itself

The following example demonstrates that the toxicity observed in the expression of HMGS is not due to the expression of the enzyme, but is due to its activity the production of HMG-CoA from acetoacetyl-CoA and acetyl-CoA. That is, the growth inhibition observed is not due to the metabolic burden incurred through the production of additional enzyme, but rather through the action of the enzyme in the cell.

Creating a Full Length but Catalytically Inactive HMGS

The toxicity caused by the high expression of S. cerevisiae HMGS alone in E. coli might have been be due to the toxicity caused by the high level production of a heterologous protein (B. R. Click. (1995) Biotech Advances. 13(12): 247-261) as opposed to the metabolic activity of HMGS. To differentiate between the two possibilities, a full length but catalytically inactive HMGS was created. The active site of the wild-type S. cerevisiae HMGS protein was determined by comparing the protein sequence of the yeast HMGS to the active site sequences of several mammalian HMGS proteins listed in L. L. Rokosz et al. ((1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophysics. 312(1), 1-13). The active site residues of S. cerevisiae HMGS were identical to the active site amino acid residues of the mammalian HMG-CoA synthases.

Rokosz et al. ((1994) supra) demonstrated that changing the catalytic cysteine amino acid of Human HMG-CoA synthase to an alanine created a full length HMG-CoA synthase protein that was catalytically inactive. Accordingly, the catalytic cysteine amino acid of the S. cerevisiae HMGS active site in pBAD33MevT was replaced with an alanine amino acid using site-directed mutagenesis (QuickChange Site-directed mutagenesis kit, Stratagene). The cysteine at amino acid position 159 to alanine mutant of the yeast HMGS, named HMGS(C159A), was verified by DNA sequence of the entire operon. The plasmid pBad33MevT containing the HMGS(C159A) mutant was named pBAD33MevT(C159A) (SEQ ID NO 11). High expression of pBAD33MevT(C159A) in E. coli DH10B produced no detectable mevalonate as measured by LC tandem MS (liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry), or HMG-CoA, as measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. This result shows that the HMGS(C159A) mutant is also catalytically inactive.

To construct a plasmid that expressed mutant HMG-CoA synthase alone, HMGS(C159A) was amplified from pBAD33MevT(C159A) using standard PCR protocols and primers complementary to the 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene. HMGS(C159A) gene was cloned into the XmaI-SalI sites of pBAD33, low copy number, arabinose inducible plasmid, by digesting both the empty vector and PCR product with XmaI and SalI restriction enzymes and ligating with T4 DNA ligase. The resulting plasmid was named pHMGS(C159A) (SEQ ID NO 12).

Determination of the Cause of the Growth Inhibition

To determine why the high expression of HMGS in E. coli causes growth inhibition, the effect of high expression of the wild-type HMGS was compared to the effect of high expression of the full length, catalytically inactive HMGS. HMGS(C159A). Plasmids pBAD33 (the empty plasmid control), pHMGS, pHMGS(C159A), pBAD33MevT and pBAD33MevT(C159A) were transformed into E. coli DH10B using standard procedures. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A single colony of each strain was transferred from the LB agar plate to 5 ml of LB liquid medium containing the same antibiotic. This seed culture was incubated with shaking at 37° C. until growth reached a stationary phase.

The five different seed cultures were used to inoculate 96-well microtiter plates containing 0.2 ml volumes of LB media, 1% (wt/vol) Glycerol, and antibiotics. The 96-well plate cultures were shaken continuously at 37° C. in a micro-titer plate reader and induced with 2 mM arabinose at 2 hours post inoculation. The cell growth of each culture is displayed in FIG. 7.

As shown in FIG. 7, in comparison to the control (strain harboring pBAD33), high expression of HMGS in E. coli (in strain harboring pHMGS) causes growth inhibition while high expression of the HMGS(C159A) mutant in E. coli (in strains harboring pHMGS(C159A)) does not. Because the only difference between pHMGS and pHMGS(C159A) is the conversion of the catalytic cysteine to an alanine, this result demonstrates that the toxicity caused by high expression of wild-type HMGS is due to the enzymatic activity of the protein and not merely the growth inhibition that can be caused by high expression of heterologous proteins (B. R. Glick, (1995) Biotech Advances. 13(12): 247-261). Furthermore, E. coli expressing the inactive MevT operon at high levels (in strain harboring pBAD33MevT(C159A)) portrays the same growth profile as the control, while high expression of the functional MevT operon (in strain harboring pBAD33MevT) inhibits cell growth. This result demonstrates that growth inhibition caused by high expression of all the genes in the MevT operon is not due to growth inhibition caused by high expression of heterologous proteins.

In addition, FIG. 7 demonstrates that the toxicity from high expression of the MevT operon, caused by the intercellular accumulation of HMG-CoA (see Examples 5 and 6, above), can be alleviated by reducing the activity of HMGS. Although the activity of HMGS is reduced to zero in this example, there are a reduced levels of HMGS activity that will alleviate the growth inhibition while still allowing the production of mevalonate. High expression of a pathway balanced in enzyme activity results in the increased production of mevalonate per volume of cell culture.

FIG. 7. Effect of high expression of catalytically inactive HMGS on E. coli cell growth. Comparison of cell growth of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33 (empty plasmid control), pBAD33MevT, pBAD33 MevT(C159A) (contains inactive HMGS), pHMGS, and pHMGS(C159A) (contains inactive HMGS).

Example 5 Growth Inhibition of E. coli Over Expressing the MevT Operon is Due to the Intracellular Accumulation of HMG-CoA

The following examples demonstrate that the growth inhibition seen upon expressing the MevT operon is due to the accumulation of HMG-CoA.

E. coli DH10B strains harboring plasmids pBAD33 (the empty plasmid control), pHMGS, pHMGSR, and pBAD33MevT were grown overnight at 37° C. in 5 ml of LB media and antibiotics under non-inducing conditions. The overnight cultures were used to inoculate baffled shake flasks containing 100 ml of LB media, 1% (wt/vol) Glycerol, and antibiotics. The cultures were shaken continuously at 37° C. and induced with 2 mM arabinose at 2 hours post inoculation. The intracellular levels of HMG-CoA in each strain and the cell growth of each culture were measured and the results are displayed in FIG. 8 and FIG. 9, respectively.

As shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, in comparison to the empty vector control (the strain harboring pBAD33), high expression of HMGS (in the strain harboring pHMGS) causes the accumulation of HMG-CoA and growth inhibition. Interestingly, high level. expression of both HMGS and HMGR in conjunction (in the strain harboring pHMGSR) causes no growth inhibition and accumulates no detectable level of HMG-CoA, and is generally similar to the control in these respects. However, the high expression of atoB, HMGS and HMGR together in tie MevT operon in E. coli (in the strain harboring pBAD33MevT) causes growth inhibition and the accumulation of HMG-CoA at later times.

E. coli naturally produces acetoacetyl-CoA at a low level from the native expression of atoB and the degradation of short chain fatty acids. The results shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 demonstrate that high expression of HMGS alone in E. coli produces HMG-CoA from the native supply of acetoacetyl-CoA. Because HMG-CoA is not native to E. coli, it is not known to be acted upon by any enzyme in E. coli and will not cross the cell membrane; therefore, HMG-CoA accumulates in the cell. At a certain level, HMG-CoA inhibits cellular processes. However, high expression of HMGS and HMGR together allows the HMG-CoA that is produced from the native supply of acetoacetyl-CoA by HMGS to be converted to mevalonate. Mevalonate will pass across the cellular membrane and accumulate in the media. Additionally, high extra-cellular concentrations of mevalonate appear to have no significant effect on the growth of E. coli (Martin et al. (2003) supra.

FIG. 8, Intracellular HMG-CoA levels of E. coli strains expressing mevalonate pathway constructs. HMG-CoA accumulation in E. coli harboring pBad33 (empty plasmid control), pHMGS, pHMGSR, and pBAD33MevT.

FIG. 9. Cell growth of E. coli strains expressing mevalonate pathway constructs. Comparison of cell growth of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33 (empty plasmid control), pHMGS, pHMGSR, and pBAD33MevT.

High expression of atoB, together with HMGS and HMGR, provides increased substrate for HMGS and substantially increases the production of mevalonate (T. Kuzuyama. (2004) Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68(4): 931-934); however, if the total activity of HUMS is greater than that of HMGR, the intermediate HMG-CoA will again accumulate and cause growth inhibition. Thus, in one embodiment, the present invention provides a method for relieving the growth inhibition toxicity of HMG CoA accumulation in a cell, which method comprises modifying the cell to increase expression of HMGR, relative to HMGS. In one embodiment, the HMGR activity is increased to a level about equal to the HMGS activity. In other embodiments, the HMGR activity is increased to levels 1.5, 2, 5, and 10 times the HMGS activity.

Example 6 Increased Expression of HMGR Alleviates the Growth Inhibition Caused by High Expression of MevT, Decreases the Accumulation of HMG-CoA, and Increases the Production of Mevalonate

The following example shows how one can increase mevalonate production and overcome the toxicity problem caused by the accumulation of HMG-CoA due to over-expression of HMGR.

To demonstrate that the intracellular accumulation of HMG-CoA was toxic to E. coli and to begin optimizing the pathway to correct this problem, the activity of HMGR was increased in strains expressing the MevT operon at high levels. E. coli DH10B was transformed with the following combinations of two plasmids to create three dual plasmid systems: pBAD33 & pBAD18 (empty plasmid control strain), pBAD33MevT & pBAD18, and pBAD33MevT & pBAD18HMGR. Transformants were selected on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml carbenicillin and 50 μg/ml chloramphenicol. A single colony of each strain was transferred from the LB agar plate to 5 ml of LB liquid medium containing the same antibiotic. This seed culture was incubated by shaking at 37° C. until growth reached a stationary phase.

The three different seed cultures were used to inoculate baffled shake flasks containing 100 ml of LB media, 1% (wt/vol) Glycerol, and antibiotics. The cultures were shaken continuously at 37° C. and induced with 2 mM arabinose at 2 hours post inoculation. The cell growth of each culture, the intracellular levels of HMG-CoA in each strain and mevalonate produced in each culture were measured by the methods described in Example 1. The results for the three dual plasmid systems are displayed in FIGS. 10, 11 and 12, respectively.

As shown in FIGS. 10 and 11, in comparison to the control strain (the strain harboring pBAD3) 3 and pBAD18), the high expression of MevT in the strain harboring pBAD33MevT and pBAD18 again causes growth inhibition and the accumulation of HMG-CoA. However, increased expression of HMGR in a strain expressing MevT at a high level (the strain harboring pBAD33MevT and pBAD18HMGR), alleviates the growth inhibition in part and reduces the accumulation of HMG-CoA. Additionally, as shown in FIG. 12, the increased expression of HMGR leads to increased production of mevalonate. Increasing the expression of HMGR is only one illustrative method of the invention to increase the activity of HMGR in E. coli cells. Other methods of the invention for increasing the activity of HMGR would lead to similar results.

Expression of MBIS and ADS in the strain with increased activity of HMGR and high expression of MevT, can result in increased production of amorphadiene. In addition, increasing the activity of HMGR and alleviating the toxicity caused by the high expression of MevT call increase the production of any isoprenoid given that an enzymatic pathway from mevalonate to the isoprenoid of interest is co-expressed.

FIG. 10. Effect of increased expression of HMGR on cell growth of E. coli expressing the MevT operon. Cell growth of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33+pBad18 (empty vector control), pBad33MevT+pBad18, and pBad33MevT+pBad18HMGR.

FIG. 11. Effect of increased expression of HMGR on HMG-CoA levels of E. coli expressing the MevT operon. Intracellular HMG-CoA levels of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33+pBad18 (empty vector control), pBad33MevT+pBad18, and pBad33MevT+pBad18HMGR.

FIG. 12. Effect of increased expression of HMGR on mevalonate production of E. coli expressing the MevT operon. Mevalonate levels in cultures of E. coli harboring plasmids pBad33pBad18 (empty vector control), pBad33MevT+pBad18, and pBad33MevT+pBad18HMGR.

Example 7 Application of a Subject Method to a Mevalonate Producing Host Cell

The present example illustrates how the methods of the invention can be applied to any mevalonate producing host strain in which HMG-CoA levels accumulate to toxic levels. In general, a host cell is modified in some way in an attempt to achieve higher levels of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor (e.g., mevalonate, IPP, a polyprenyl diphosphate, and the like), to generate a “parent” cell. Suitable modifications include, e.g., modifications that increase the intracellular pool of acetyl-CoA, modifications that increase the level of acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase activity, and modifications that increase the level of HMGS activity. These modifications could be effectuated by genetic or chemical alterations or treatments intended to modify transcript levels, enzyme levels, or specific activity of enzymes.

The growth characteristics of the parent host cell are observed, and compared to the growth characteristics of the unmodified host cell. If the parent host cells grows significantly slower than the unmodified host cell, then the observed growth inhibition may be due to HMG-CoA toxicity, and the resulting levels of mevalonate or isoprenoid production would be suboptimal.

The levels of HMG-CoA in the host cell and the parent cell are determined through established extraction and LC-MS techniques (see Example 1) to verify the predicted reason for the growth inhibition. If the level of HMG-CoA per unit biomass (biomass measured as dry cell weight or by measuring the optical density at, for example 600 nm) is higher in the modified host cell, then those measurements support the conclusion that the toxicity is due to HMG-CoA accumulation, and, if so, decreasing levels within the cell will serve to alleviate this toxicity and increase total mevalonate, IPP, or isoprenoid production. While measurement of HMG-CoA levels in an HMG-CoA producing cell that is growth inhibited is not a required step in a subject method of relieving toxicity induced by HMG-CoA accumulation, such measurements may be conducted from time to time in certain embodiments

HMG-CoA toxicity and improved isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor production can be relieved by practice of the present invention. For example, the parent host cell can be genetically modified in a number of ways, resulting in a genetically modified host cell that produces an increased level of HMGR compared to the parent host cell. For example, the copy number of a vector comprising a nucleotide sequence that encodes HMGR is increased within the parent host cell, e.g., by genetically modifying the parent host cell with a high copy number plasmid that expresses HMGR under the control of a promoter. As another example, the level of HMGR mRNA in the parent cell is increased, e.g., by genetically modifying the parent cell with a construct that comprises an HMGR-encoding nucleotide sequence that is under control of a stronger promoter. As another example, the ribosome binding site upstream of hmgR in the parent host cell is modified to generate a genetically modified host cell that produces an increased level of HMGR. By observing the growth characteristics of the genetically modified host cell and comparing them to the growth characteristics of the parent host cell, one can determine that the method has been successful when the genetically modified host cell shows less or none of the growth inhibition of the parent. Relief of HMG-CoA toxicity will be observed as an increase in growth rate and/or increase in final cell density of the culture.

As another example, a parent host cell is generated by increasing the level of HMG-CoA in a cell that has an endogenous mevalonate pathway. For example, the level of intracellular acetyl-CoA within a yeast cell, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is increased by introducing mutations into (genetically modifying) the yeast cell, creating a “parent” host cell. For example, the intracellular acetyl-CoA level is increased by introducing a mutation within the pyruvate decarboxylase gene on the chromosome. This is accomplished using one-step gene disruption (Rothstein, R. J. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101 202-211 One-step gene disruption in yeast) to disrupt pyruvate decarboxylase. Similarly, inactive or partially active alleles of pyruvate decarboxylase are generated by integrative DNA transformation in yeast (Rothstein, R. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194 281-301). PCR-based disruption of pyruvate decarboxylase is accomplished using a prior knockout in a different Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, such as strain S288C (Reid et al. Yeast. 2002 Mar. 15; 19(4):319-28, Mehdi, K. Yeast 2002 Jun. 30; 19(9):803). Such alterations decrease the flux of pyruvate to ethanol via acetaldehyde and indirectly increases acetyl-coA levels.

The increase in the intracellular acetyl-CoA level can, in turn, result in an increase in acetylacetyl-CoA levels, which can, in turn, lead to an increase in intracellular HMG-CoA levels. To achieve increased HMG-CoA levels, a host cell can be further genetically modified to increase the level of acetoacetyl CoA thiolase activity and/or the level of HMGS activity within the cell to increase the conversion of acetyl-CoA into HMG-CoA, generating a parent yeast host cell that exhibits high intracellular levels of HMG-CoA. An), vector designed for replication and selection in yeast and incorporating a promoter active in yeast, typically also including a yeast terminator downstream of the promoter, will be used to express genes in yeast. Examples of yeast replicons include the 2μ or CEN replicons such as CEN6/ARSH4; examples of selectable markers include the HIS3, TRP1, LEU2 or URA3 markers; examples of yeast promoters include the CYC1, ADH, TEF or GPD promoters; an example of a yeast terminator is the yeast CYC1 terminator. Examples of expression vectors are given in Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk. M., Gene, 1995 Apr. 14; 156(1):119-22. A variety of yeast vectors are available for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Another example of a yeast expression vector is pYES2 (Invitrogen Corporation).

The growth characteristics of the parent host yeast cell to the unmodified host yeast cell are compared by crowing each cell separately under standard conditions in standard growth media with selection for the plasmid expressing the gene of interest. Examples of yeast media include Yeast extract peptone dextrose (YPD), Synthetic dextrose minimal medium (SD), supplemented minimal medium (SMM) and synthetic complete (SC or CM) medium (Sambrook and Russell (2001) Molecular Cloning: A laboratory manual. ISBN 0-87969-577-3).

If the growth rate of the parent host cell is significantly slower than the growth rate of the unmodified host yeast cell, HMG-CoA accumulation may be the cause of this toxicity/growth inhibition. To overcome the HMG-CoA accumulation-induced cell growth inhibition, the parent yeast cell is genetically modified, in accordance with the methods of the invention. For example, a parent yeast host cell is genetically modified by replacing the endogenous HMGR gene on the chromosome of S. cerevisiae with a nucleic acid encoding HMGR that lacks the N-terminal regulatory region of the enzyme (Donald et al. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 September; 63(9):3341-4. Polakowski et al. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998 January; 49(1):66-71), thus increasing the level of HMG-CoA activity within the cell. If a comparison of the growth characteristics of the genetically modified host yeast cell with those of the parent host yeast cell shows a significant increase in growth rate, the increase in growth rate can be attributed to a decrease in toxic intracellular HMG-CoA levels.

As a result, the total levels of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced by the genetically modified host strain will increase, compared to the levels produced by the parent host strain.

For example, the parent and genetically modified S. cerevisiae are engineered to express amorphadiene synthase. For example, the gene for amorphadiene synthase (either the native Artemisia annua gene, the E. coli codon-optimized gene (Martin et al, 2003) or a yeast codon-optimized gene) is cloned into the multiple cloning site of pYES2 such that the amorphadiene synthase gene is transcribed under the control of the GAL1 promoter. A host yeast cell is transformed with the recombinant plasmid, selecting for uracil auxotrophy. Following growth in a medium lacking uracil and glucose, expression of amorphadiene synthase is induced by the addition of galactose. The level of intracellular HMG-CoA is increased in the amorphadiene synthase-producing yeast cell by introducing one or more mutations, as described above, generating a parent host yeast cell. The parent host yeast cell is genetically modified, as described above, e.g., to increase the level of HMGR in the cell. The production of the amorphadiene in cultures of parent host yeast cell and the genetically modified host yeast cell are compared; the level of amorphadiene produced by the genetically modified host cell is greater than the level of amorphadiene produced by the parent host cell. Amorphadiene levels are readily measured using GC-MS analysis.

As another example, HMG-CoA toxicity is observed in parent E. coli cell engineered to express the mevalonate pathway. The HMG-CoA toxicity is relieved by genetically modifying the parent cell, e.g., to increase the level of HMGR in the cell. This example is outlined in examples 1-6, above. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the method can be performed with any host cell or any construct now in light of the present disclosure.

While the present invention has been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process step or steps, to the objective, spirit and scope of the present invention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope of the claims appended hereto. 

1.-34. (canceled)
 35. A genetically modified host cell that produces an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor, wherein the genetically modified host cell is a prokaryotic host cell that does not normally produce isopentenyl pyrophosphate via a mevalonate pathway, wherein the genetically modified host cell is genetically modified to produce heterologous hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) synthase (HMGS) and heterologous HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR), wherein the relative activity level of the HMGR produced in the genetically modified host cell is higher than the relative activity level of the HMGS produced in the genetically modified host cell, and wherein the genetically modified host cell is further genetically modified to produce one or more additional heterologous mevalonate pathway enzymes selected from: (a) an acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; (b) a mevalonate kinase; (c) a phosphomevalonate kinase; and (d) a mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase; wherein the genetically modified host cell produces the isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor at a level at least as high as the level produced in a control host cell expressing pBAD33MevT sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2, and wherein the genetically modified host cell exhibits less HMG-CoA induced growth inhibition compared to the control host cell.
 36. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the host cell is an Escherichia coli strain.
 37. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase is heterologous to the genetically modified host cell.
 38. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the genetically modified host cell comprises two or more copies of a heterologous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the HMGR.
 39. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 50% higher than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 40. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 2-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 41. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 5-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 42. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 10-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 43. The genetically modified host cell of claim 35, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 50-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 44. A genetically modified host cell that produces an isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor, wherein the genetically modified host cell is a prokaryotic host cell that does not normally produce isopentenyl pyrophosphate via a mevalonate pathway, wherein the genetically modified host cell is genetically modified to produce heterologous hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) synthase (HMGS) and heterologous HMG-CoA reductase (HMGR), wherein the relative activity level of the HMGR produced in the genetically modified host cell is higher than the relative activity level of the HMGS produced in the genetically modified host cell, and wherein the genetically modified host cell is further genetically modified to produce one or more additional heterologous mevalonate pathway enzymes selected from: (a) an acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase; (b) a mevalonate kinase; (c) a phosphomevalonate kinase; and (d) a mevalonate pyrophosphate decarboxylase; wherein the genetically modified host cell produces the isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor at a level at least as high as the level produced in a control host cell expressing pBAD24MevT sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:1, and wherein the genetically modified host cell exhibits less HMG-CoA induced growth inhibition compared to the control host cell.
 45. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the host cell is an Escherichia coli strain.
 46. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the acetoacetyl-CoA thiolase is heterologous to the genetically modified host cell.
 47. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the genetically modified host cell comprises two or more copies of a heterologous nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding the HMGR.
 48. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 50% higher than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 49. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 2-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 50. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 5-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 51. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 10-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell.
 52. The genetically modified host cell of claim 44, wherein the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the genetically modified host cell is at least about 50-fold than the level of isoprenoid or isoprenoid precursor produced in the control host cell. 